spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Please Don't Reject SPF NEUTRAL

2004-09-17 11:12:05
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of guy
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 1:59 PM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: RE: [spf-discuss] Please Don't Reject SPF NEUTRAL


It seems to me that there should be something between PASS and NEUTRAL.
Having no SPF record should be -all, IMHO, but let us assume that this is
not the issue for now!

So, if I had no record, default to NEUTRAL.  I understand someone blocking
this, I want to myself, but I don't, yet.  But if I get mail from the SMTP
server you said is valid for your domain, I would trust it more than
NEUTRAL.  It should not be PASS since it could still be forged,
but only by
a small group of people, not the whole world!

Not sure I am explaining it very well.  I hope everyone understands what I
am saying.

I thought it would be a nice idea too.  See if you can search the archives
for 'SOFTPASS' and you'll see how far I got....

Scott Kitterman