On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 12:00, Marc Kool wrote:
"because I like it, I go against the design of postfix. living in a free
world..."
Pfff. what a disrespectful statement.
How so?
Now that I know what your motivation is, I will not ask any more about it.
Who pissed in your Korn Flakes this morning? You asked a question and I
gave you a much better answer then I believe that the question
warranted. My apologies if you feel that you have been personally
victimized by my last e-mail, the intent was not to hurt your feelings
but to illustrate the pointlessness of your e-mail.
My motivation is to provide those interested in using libSPF ways to use
it. Patching the source code hardly goes against the design of Postfix,
especially considering that when I asked Wietse back in January about
patching it he made no attempts to discourage it.
If you wish to flame me further please do so off list.
Cheers,
James
--
James Couzens,
Programmer
( ( (
((__)) __\|/__ __|-|__ '. ___ .'
(00) (o o) (0~0) ' (> <) '
---nn-(o__o)-nn---ooO--(_)--Ooo--ooO--(_)--Ooo---ooO--(_)--Ooo---
http://libspf.org -- ANSI C Sender Policy Framework library
http://libsrs.org -- ANSI C Sender Rewriting Scheme library
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7A7C7DCF
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in Atlanta features
SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part