Re: Look at that patent application again

Holm, Mark wrote:

This thing matters!


Sure, but only because it's relevant it doesn't make me
competent.  So all I can do is to continue to click and
double-click, and if Amazon or doubleclick.net have any
problems with this, because they have patented or trade-
marked less-than-treble-click, they're expected to sue
me.  It's not a "burn all sender policies" situation.

                 Bye, Frank

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: SPF With domain hosting, (continued) Re: SPF With domain hosting, Dale Ghent Re: SPF With domain hosting, Len Conrad Re: SPF With domain hosting, Koen Martens Re: SPF With domain hosting, Rodolfo Sikora Re: SPF With domain hosting, Joe Rhett Re: SPF With domain hosting, Koen Martens Re: Look at that patent application again, Paul Howarth Microsoft's email which went out today explaining what happened with MARID, Sender I.D., etc.., Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com> Re: Look at that patent application again, Holm, Mark Re: Look at that patent application again, Holm, Mark Re: Look at that patent application again, Frank Ellermann <=

Previous by Date:	Patent Strategy, Jonathan Gardner
Next by Date:	Re: Disappointed, yet..not surprised (was Re: Disap pointed), Nick Phillips
Previous by Thread:	Re: Look at that patent application again, Holm, Mark
Next by Thread:	The Good Domain List, Meng Weng Wong
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]