----- Original Message -----
From: "Stefan Engelbert" <stefan(_at_)gfi(_dot_)com>
To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 3:08 PM
Subject: RE: [SPFTAG] - RE: [spf-discuss] No use of checking RFC2822
headers - Sender is probably forged (SPF Softfail)
I think this whole discussion is for nothing.
Considering that rarely people put their address as pretty name you can
allready prefilter emails as spam which have a valid email address as
pretty name.
Maybe you can even consider to mark everything as SPAM which has an @ in
the pretty name.
Or you compare pretty name with addresss when pretty name is a valid
email address.
It think this pretty name discussion should be placed somewhere in a
SPAM Filter forum
and not in a SenderID Forum.
Kind Regards
Stefan Engelbert
This is the SPF-discuss mail-list - in case you hadn't noticed. Maybe
you're on the wrong channel - Sender_ID is probably being discussed
somewhere else.
Slainte,
JohnP.
johnp(_at_)idimo(_dot_)com
ICQ 313355492