Re: [SPFTAG] - RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers

spf-discuss

Re: [SPFTAG] - RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers - Sender is probably forged (SPF Softfail)

2004-09-30 07:41:39

from [jamesp]

On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:08:37 +0200, Stefan Engelbert 
<stefan(_at_)gfi(_dot_)com> wrote:

It think this pretty name discussion should be placed somewhere in a
SPAM Filter forum
and not in a SenderID Forum.


This is an SPF Forum

..James

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [SPFTAG] - RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers - Sender is probably forged (SPF Softfail), Stefan Engelbert Re: [SPFTAG] - RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers - Sender is probably forged (SPF Softfail), Chris Haynes [SPFTAG] - RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers - Sender is probably forged (SPF Softfail), Roger Moser RE: [SPFTAG] - RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers - Sender is probably forged (SPF Softfail), terry Re: [SPFTAG] - RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers - Sender is probably forged (SPF Softfail), jpinkerton Re: [SPFTAG] - RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers - Sender is probably forged (SPF Softfail), jamesp <= RE: [SPFTAG] - RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers - Sender is probably forged (SPF Softfail), Stefan Engelbert

Previous by Date:	Re: Unified SPF Algorithm (was: moving on from MARID), Hector Santos
Next by Date:	Re: Re: draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03 - scope questions and comments, wayne
Previous by Thread:	Re: [SPFTAG] - RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers - Sender is probably forged (SPF Softfail), jpinkerton
Next by Thread:	RE: [SPFTAG] - RE: No use of checking RFC2822 headers - Sender is probably forged (SPF Softfail), Stefan Engelbert
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]