RE: Processed-By (or Transmitted-By) header concept

OK, so would another way to say this be that the Processed-By concept is not
meant to be useful for authorization or authentication, but to be a
(somewhat) human readable log of what happened for troublshooting or other
purposes and that the SUBMITTER identity is meant to be used for
authorization processing?


Yes, exactly!
 
-- 
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Processed-By (or Transmitted-By) header concept, william(at)elan.net Re: Processed-By (or Transmitted-By) header concept, Douglas Otis Re: Processed-By (or Transmitted-By) header concept, william(at)elan.net Re: Processed-By (or Transmitted-By) header concept, Douglas Otis RE: Processed-By (or Transmitted-By) header concept, Scott Kitterman RE: Processed-By (or Transmitted-By) header concept, william(at)elan.net RE: Processed-By (or Transmitted-By) header concept, Scott Kitterman RE: Processed-By (or Transmitted-By) header concept, william(at)elan.net <= RE: Processed-By (or Transmitted-By) header concept, Scott Kitterman Processed-By (or Transmitted-By) header concept, Roger Moser RE: Processed-By (or Transmitted-By) header concept, Scott Kitterman Re: Processed-By (or Transmitted-By) header concept, Alan Hodgson Re: Processed-By (or Transmitted-By) header concept, Danny Angus Re: Processed-By (or Transmitted-By) header concept, Douglas Otis Re: Processed-By (or Transmitted-By) header concept, Justin Mason Re: Processed-By (or Transmitted-By) header concept, Douglas Otis Re: Processed-By (or Transmitted-By) header concept, william(at)elan.net Re: Processed-By (or Transmitted-By) header concept, william(at)elan.net