-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 24 September 2004 11:11 am, Scott Kitterman wrote:
For a one person consulting business,
reputation is very important, having to call a customer and tell them I
can't e-mail them because of [fill in the blank, it just doesn't matter]
is going to hurt.
Having to tell your employer about felonies you've committed is the same
thing. If I send spam, I want to be held accountable. I want the degree of
accountability such that I won't ever be able to send email ever again. At
least, any email I do send should come with a yellow warning sign and a
flashing notice: "JONATHAN GARDNER SENT THIS MAIL AND HE IS A KNOWN
SPAMMER."
I understand why you can't publish for PASS yet. I still encourage you to
work with your email service provider to get the problem fixed. I have
already said that I agree that it is premature to drop SPF NEUTRAL.
However. that is the choice of the receiver, not the sender, and certainly
not anyone else. They can go ahead and stop receiving email from everyone
but their friends. They can stop accepting email altogether. That is their
choice. It's their loss if they can't get your mail. It's your loss too,
but it mostly affects your relationship with them, not with others.
- --
Jonathan M. Gardner
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBVIIjBFeYcclU5Q0RAhGIAKCGTK9hgqMp8HUl0oiEaJxnKInxOQCgugm8
shJT3qgbGdKrTt1UHJbzcW0=
=9ICq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----