spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: View from the trenches

2004-09-08 08:28:03
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

bob(_at_)rasey(_dot_)net wrote:
| I have just implemented SPF for the company I work for, and posted a
| little thing on my blog about it...
|
| http://bob.rasey.net/archives/000173.html
|
| My point in posting to the list is for you all to note the first
| comment posted...
|
| We probably need to focus on combatting the damage done by the
| CipherTrust report for awhile.  The poster is probably small fry, but
| we may have a situation where takeup will be slow due to a broad
| misunderstanding by tens of thousands of geeky small fry.
|
| The quickest, cheapest way I can think of to start is for the few
| SPF-friendly sites to link to each other on their homepages, thereby
| causing search-engine hits for "SPF" to hit our pages (hopefully)
| instead of The Register's or other news sites.
|
| I'm game, anyone else?

FYI... http://moongroup.com supports SPF and I have published several
articles there about the benefits of SPF and quite critical of SenderID
in its current incarnation. Licensing et. al.

- --
Chuck Mead <csm(_at_)redhat(_dot_)com>
Instructor II (and resident Postfix bigot), GLS
Disclaimer: "It's Thursday and my name is Locutus of B0rk!"
Addendum: "Bwahahaha! Fire up the orbital mind-control lasers!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBPyUDZfy0juH51WsRAhu9AJsHBRG2EaIx73IptsxJfQyYhR/dywCbBF+U
TMITPKAGBx5X4e+KbR1beio=
=Y4iC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>