Is it all possible to add SPF 2.0 provision for consideration of the most
important entity of the 2821 transaction? The forwarding address;
2821.RCPTTO?
If RCPTTO fails, then all your steps is all for nothing.
Sincerely,
Hector Santos, CTO
Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com
305-431-2846 Cell
305-248-3204 Office
----- Original Message -----
From: "william(at)elan.net" <william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net>
To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Unified SPF Algorithm (was: moving on from MARID)
Actually some modifications to what I wrote are necessary to make
sure if PTR is not there SUBMIT would override MFROM. It should be like:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Step | SPF Identity | Result of verification
------+---------------+-------------------------------------------
1 | SPF2.0/HELO | If Fail -> reject, otherwise go to 2
2 | SPF2.0/SUBMIT | If Fail -> reject, otherwise go to 3
3 | SPF2.0/MFROM | If Pass -> accept email, otherwise go to 4
4 | SPF2.0/PTR | If Fail and #1 was not Pass -> reject, otherwise 5
5 | n/a | If #1, #2, #4 are None and #3 is Fail -> reject
| | othewise accept email
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in Atlanta
features SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com