-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 09 September 2004 08:28 am, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 03:12:31PM -0700, Jonathan Gardner wrote:
| Yes, I go through the whole supposed evolution, including the bits on
| accreditation and reputation. I show how SPF *alone* doesn't contain
| any information on spam, but SPF validation + outside sources on
| spamminess of domain will.
in my recent presentations I have been showing people a live
demo of rating.cloudmark.com as a fine example of a
domain-based reputation system. People get it much quicker
when you cut to the chase. Putting two and two together
then only needs a little bit of guidance.
Cloudmark calls Sender ID "Microsoft's Sender ID". I don't believe this is
appropriate. Do you know about this?
- --
Jonathan M. Gardner
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBQJDzBFeYcclU5Q0RAm43AJ4kWQWvSgXfyhBqPEUlzFkOt2cgGQCeKuBO
WUrVZDybY60z2PRb7thlTIA=
=vYow
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----