On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 03:04:05PM -0700, Catherine Hampton wrote:
| I'm mostly a lurker here, but read the Apache Software Foundation
| statement on Sender ID. I like SPF, and was planning to support it.
| I have the same objections to Sender ID as the ASF does, though.
| I've therefore reluctantly put on hold my plans to add support for
| it to the SpamBouncer. I just put a statement on the SpamBouncer
| web page linking to the ASF statement and indicating my agreement
| with it.
|
| If anyone is interested in returning to the original SPF proposal,
| pre-Microsoft, and can get a significant group to agree to support
| that, I would definitely want to work with that effort.
|
I'm catching up with threads that are a month old now, but
for the record I'd like to recommend that people continue to
work on SPF Classic deployment if they like it.
I'm a little bit boggled that people feel like they need my
permission to do something they want to do.