MAIN QUESTION:
Do you believe that "SPF Community" needs to evolve into more structured
organization (rather then the current form of individuals participation
on the spf-discuss list with Meng as a chair of the group) and are you
willing to deligate responsibility for administering further development
of SPF to this organization?
Answers: YES / NO
Answer: YES
If answered yes, please answer as follows:
1. Do you prefer to have organization with
a. Strong member-chosen decision making board (i.e. parliment system)
which takes imput from community but can make all the decisions OR
b. Loose leadership commitee with functions limited to facilitating
discussion and deciding on the consensus (i.e. IETF WG model)
Answers: A / B
Answer: A
2. Please give approximate number of people that you believe to be
on the organization's oversight board:
a. 2-3
b. 4-6
c. 7-10
Answers: A / B / C
Answer: B but 5
3. Do you believe that organization function should include:
a. Maintainance of SPF website: YES / NO
b. Publishing official SPF protocol documents: YES/NO
c. Sponsoring development of SPF implementaton libraries: YES/NO
d. Providing support to end-users who publish SPF records: YES/NO
e. Provididing official SPF position on given topics
(per request of media, government, etc): YES/NO
f. Communication with softwre vendors and companies
in regards to SPF deployment: YES/NO
Answer: YES to all
4. Do you believe that for this organization to work it must have
official legal status (i.e. non-profit corporation)?
a. Not ever
b. Not now but maybe in the future
c. Should start on legally organized body now
Answers: A / B / C
Answer: C
If you answered C are you ready to immediatly donate up to US $100
for expenses related to establishing of this organization and thereafter
donate at least $50/year?
Answers: YES / NO
Answer: YES
5. In case founder of SPF Community (Meng) does not support creating of
this organization, should the group of other participants still go
ahead with its creation?
Answers: YES /NO
Answer: YES
If you answered YES in above, do you understand that this may mean a
split from current SPF group as represented by spf-discuss mail list?
Answers: YES / NO
Answer: YES but this may not be a real consquence
Addendum:
We a netpilot are thinking of offering a safe harbour to the SPF
community. (Webspace, etc......) Things should be more organized a Mailing
list is not a real practice platform for setting standards
yours
Gerhard W. Recher
(Geschäftsführer)
NETpilot GmbH
Wilhelm-Riehl-Str. 13
D-80687 München
Tel: ++49 89 547182 0
Fax: ++49 89 547182 33
GSM: ++49 171 4802507
w3: http://www.netpilot.net
e-Mail: mailto:Gerhard(_dot_)Recher(_at_)netpilot(_dot_)net
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in Atlanta features
SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com