On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 04:35:28 -0700 (PDT), william(at)elan.net
<william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net> wrote:
Instead of specific proposal as posted by John, I'd like to raise a point
of order question about directions for future for EVERYBODY on this list.
Interleaved below
Do you believe that "SPF Community" needs to evolve into more structured
organization (rather then the current form of individuals participation
on the spf-discuss list with Meng as a chair of the group) and are you
willing to deligate responsibility for administering further development
of SPF to this organization?
Answers: YES / NO
YES
1. Do you prefer to have organization with
a. Strong member-chosen decision making board (i.e. parliment system)
which takes imput from community but can make all the decisions OR
b. Loose leadership commitee with functions limited to facilitating
discussion and deciding on the consensus (i.e. IETF WG model)
B
2. Please give approximate number of people that you believe to be
on the organization's oversight board:
a. 2-3
b. 4-6
c. 7-10
Answers: A / B / C
B
3. Do you believe that organization function should include:
a. Maintainance of SPF website: YES / NO
b. Publishing official SPF protocol documents: YES/NO
c. Sponsoring development of SPF implementaton libraries: YES/NO
d. Providing support to end-users who publish SPF records: YES/NO
e. Provididing official SPF position on given topics
(per request of media, government, etc): YES/NO
f. Communication with softwre vendors and companies
in regards to SPF deployment: YES/NO
a - NO
b - YES
c - NO
d - NO
e - YES
f - YES
4. Do you believe that for this organization to work it must have
official legal status (i.e. non-profit corporation)?
a. Not ever
b. Not now but maybe in the future
c. Should start on legally organized body now
B
5. In case founder of SPF Community (Meng) does not support creating of
this organization, should the group of other participants still go
ahead with its creation?
Answers: YES /NO
NO !
Cheers
--
T