-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of Julian
Mehnle
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 9:45 AM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: [spf-discuss] RE: Sender ID in the news
I thought one of the main points of RFC 2822 checking was to avoid the
forwarding problems of RFC 2821 checking. If you do both, you might get
the worst of both worlds.
And now that v=SPF1 records designed for 2821 checking are going to be
repurposed for 2822 checking, it's pretty much unavoidable that you will get
the best of both worlds.
Scott Kitterman