Re: New ideas for RFC2822 headers checking with SPF

Seth Goodman wrote:

> That seems like a reasonable trade-off, and I invite anyone
> to make a compelling case against it, as it is a very
> important issue and we need to get it right.
Do you have BATV and SRS on your list with known problems of
2822 From ~ 2821 MAIL FROM equivalence schemes ?  And PRA has
similar issues, "let's all add Resent-headers" is not really
a solution (but a good joke for all spammers ;-)  Bye, Frank