In <000101c4c88d$5cade260$6c62fea9(_at_)ibmrkydk2ufvdd> "John Glube"
<jbglube(_at_)sympatico(_dot_)ca> writes:
Folks,
Gentlemen don't disclose private correspondence.
Rather than make a huge fuss, I will simply point out that
the correspondence posted below by Wayne to this public
list was sent by me to a private mailing list which is not
publicly archived to which the parties agreed to keep the
discussions in confidence.
I am sorry that my principles of being open conflict with your desire
to exclude the rest of the spf community from general discussions.
As I posted to the private spf list before hand:
: There is *nothing* here that is confidential and so I'm reposting it
: to SPF-discuss. Feel free to kick me off this list for doing so.
As I posted just a few minutes ago:
: Please remove me from this list.
:
: I want no part in a star chamber.
:
: I could see a point of having a list for truly confidential
: information, but not as a tool for excluding the rest of the SPF
: community.
Wayne broke his word. I am certain that the Microsoft
representatives who read this list will be eternally
grateful to Wayne for his exuberance in informing them of
the flaw in the Sender ID: Email Authentication draft and
will now take immediate steps to rectify the matter.
Microsoft is not the enemy.
Bad systems are the enemy.
If Microsoft suddenly decides to take my advice and fix the problems
with SenderID and the PRA, then we all win. They haven't yet, but
there is always hope.
-wayne