RE: RESULTS of the VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL - plus, recording officers statement, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/30

• RE: RESULTS of the VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL - plus, recording officers statement, Guy, 2004/11/30
  • Re: RESULTS of the VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL - plus, recording officers statement, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/30

RESULTS of the VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL - plus, recording officers statement, jpinkerton, 2004/11/30

• Re: RESULTS of the VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL - plus, recording officers statement, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/30
  • Re: RESULTS of the VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL - plus, recording officers statement, Greg Connor, 2004/11/30
• Re: RESULTS of the VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL - plus, recording officers statement, Arik Baratz, 2004/11/30
  • RE: RESULTS of the VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL - plus, recording officers statement, Brad Glore, 2004/11/30
• Thoughts on the next steps for the council, wayne, 2004/11/30
• RE: RESULTS of the VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL - plus, recording officers statement, gary, 2004/11/30

RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/29

• RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Seth Goodman, 2004/11/29
• RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Stephen Pollei, 2004/11/29
• RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/29
  • Re: Attacking Domain Keys, wayne, 2004/11/29
  • Re: Attacking Domain Keys, George Schlossnagle, 2004/11/29
• RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/29
  • RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Seth Goodman, 2004/11/29
• RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/29
  • RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Stephen Pollei, 2004/11/30
• RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/30
  • RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Seth Goodman, 2004/11/30
• RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/30
• RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/30

OT: education needed, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/29

• RE: OT: education needed, Bruce Barnes, 2004/11/29
  • Re: OT: education needed, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/29
    • Re: OT: education needed, Peter Bowyer, 2004/11/29
    • RE: OT: education needed, Mark, 2004/11/29
    • Re[2]: OT: education needed, Sanford Whiteman, 2004/11/30
    • RE: Re[2]: OT: education needed, Richard Bang, 2004/11/30
    • RE: Re[2]: OT: education needed, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/30
    • RE: Re[2]: OT: education needed, Greg Connor, 2004/11/30
    • RE: Re[2]: OT: education needed, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/30
    • Re[4]: OT: education needed, Sanford Whiteman, 2004/11/30

CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL -- 5th AND LAST REMINDER, jpinkerton, 2004/11/28

• FYI: Will be away until Thursday, Julian Mehnle, 2004/11/28
• Re: CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL -- 5th AND LAST REMINDER, wayne, 2004/11/28

lists.sourceforge.net messed up their SPF record?, Mark, 2004/11/28

• RE: lists.sourceforge.net messed up their SPF record?, Julian Mehnle, 2004/11/28

CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL -- 4th REMINDER, jpinkerton, 2004/11/27

• CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL -- 4th REMINDER, jpinkerton, 2004/11/30
  • Re: CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL -- 4th REMINDER, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/30
    • Objections TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL, jpinkerton, 2004/11/30
    • Re: Objections TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/30
    • RE: Objections TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL, Brad Glore, 2004/11/30
    • Re: Objections TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/11/30
    • Re: CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL -- 4th REMINDER, Rene Barbier, 2004/11/30

PTR problems, administrator, 2004/11/26

• Re: PTR problems, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/28
• Re: PTR problems, administrator, 2004/11/29
  • Re: PTR problems, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/11/29
    • Re: PTR problems, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/29
• RE: PTR problems, Mark, 2004/11/29
  • What is the load on DNS caused by SPF?, guy, 2004/11/29
  • RE: PTR problems, Greg Connor, 2004/11/30

domain name labels are limited to 63 characters, Roger Moser, 2004/11/26

• Re: domain name labels are limited to 63 characters, wayne, 2004/11/26
• Re: domain name labels are limited to 63 characters, Raymond Neeves, 2004/11/26
  • Re: domain name labels are limited to 63 characters, Roger Moser, 2004/11/27
  • Re: domain name labels are limited to 63 characters, wayne, 2004/11/28
• Re: domain name labels are limited to 63 characters, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/26
  • Re: domain name labels are limited to 63 characters, Roger Moser, 2004/11/26
  • Re: domain name labels are limited to 63 characters, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/26
    • Re: domain name labels are limited to 63 characters, Roger Moser, 2004/11/27
  • Re: domain name labels are limited to 63 characters, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/26

Ignoring rejected mail?, Philip Warner, 2004/11/26

• Re: Ignoring rejected mail?, Tony Finch, 2004/11/26
  • RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Mark, 2004/11/26
    • RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Tony Finch, 2004/11/26
    • RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Mark, 2004/11/26
    • RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, James Couzens, 2004/11/26

Role for the new council??, Nigel J. Carr, 2004/11/26

• Re: Role for the new council??, Andy Bakun, 2004/11/28
  • Re: Role for the new council??, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/28
• RE: Role for the new council??, Nigel J. Carr, 2004/11/30
  • RE: Role for the new council??, Andy Bakun, 2004/11/30

HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/11/25

• RE: HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, terry, 2004/11/25
  • RE: HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, Guy, 2004/11/25
    • RE: HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, Roger Moser, 2004/11/25
    • RE: HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, terry, 2004/11/26
    • Re: HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/26
    • RE: HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, terry, 2004/11/26
    • Re: HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, Greg Connor, 2004/11/30
• Re: HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/25

MX record check?, Scott Wilson, 2004/11/25

• Re: MX record check?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/11/25
• RE: MX record check?, Richard Bang, 2004/11/25

SPF lookup with intermediate ISP mail relay, Rolf, 2004/11/23

• RE: SPF lookup with intermediate ISP mail relay, Guy, 2004/11/24
• Re: SPF lookup with intermediate ISP mail relay, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/11/24
• RE: SPF lookup with intermediate ISP mail relay, Mark, 2004/11/24
  • Re: SPF lookup with intermediate ISP mail relay, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/11/24
    • RE: Re: SPF lookup with intermediate ISP mail relay, Mark, 2004/11/24
  • Re: SPF lookup with intermediate ISP mail relay, Michael Hammer, 2004/11/24
    • Re: SPF lookup with intermediate ISP mail relay, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/24
    • Re: SPF lookup with intermediate ISP mail relay, Michael Hammer, 2004/11/24
    • RE: SPF lookup with intermediate ISP mail relay, Mark, 2004/11/24
• Re: SPF lookup with intermediate ISP mail relay, Mike Markley, 2004/11/24

What's up with the Adoption Roll, Jon Bertrand, 2004/11/23

• RE: What's up with the Adoption Roll, terry, 2004/11/23
  • Re: What's up with the Adoption Roll, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Re: What's up with the Adoption Roll, wayne, 2004/11/23
    • Re: What's up with the Adoption Roll, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Re: What's up with the Adoption Roll, Greg Connor, 2004/11/23
• Re: What's up with the Adoption Roll, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/23
  • Re: Re: What's up with the Adoption Roll, James Couzens, 2004/11/25
    • Re: What's up with the Adoption Roll, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/25

RE: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address sp, Stefan Engelbert, 2004/11/23

• Re: RE: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address sp, James Couzens, 2004/11/23
  • Re: RE: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address sp, James Couzens, 2004/11/23
• Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address sp, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/11/23

RE: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IPaddress spoofi, Stefan Engelbert, 2004/11/23

• Re: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IPaddress spoofi, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/23
  • Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IPaddress spoofi, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IPaddress spoofi, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/23
• RE: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IPaddress spoofi, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/23
  • Re: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IPaddress spoofi, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IPaddress spoofi, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/23

Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address spoofing?, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/23

• Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address spoofi, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/11/23
  • Re: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address spoofi, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP addres, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP addres, James Couzens, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP addres, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP addres, James Couzens, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP addres, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/23
    • RE: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP addres, terry, 2004/11/23
    • RE: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP addres, terry, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address spoofi, James Couzens, 2004/11/23
• RE: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address spoofing?, terry, 2004/11/23
  • RE: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address spoofing?, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/23
• RE: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address spoofing?, Mark, 2004/11/23
  • OT -- stop IP address spoofing?, Stephen Pollei, 2004/11/23
• Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address spoofing?, wayne, 2004/11/23
• Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address spoofing?, Stephen Pollei, 2004/11/23
  • Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address spoofing?, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/23
    • acronym soup and request for urls, Stephen Pollei, 2004/11/23
• RE: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address spoofing?, Stefan Engelbert, 2004/11/23
  • Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address sp, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/11/23
• RE: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address spoofing?, Stefan Engelbert, 2004/11/23

RE: Voters register, Stefan Engelbert, 2004/11/23

• Re: Voters register, jpinkerton, 2004/11/23
  • Re: Voters register, Greg Connor, 2004/11/23
• RE: Voters register, Stefan Engelbert, 2004/11/23
• Re: Voters register, george+spf, 2004/11/23
  • Re: Voters register, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/23

URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, James Couzens, 2004/11/23

• Voters register, jpinkerton, 2004/11/23
  • Re: Voters register, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/23
    • RE: Voters register, terry, 2004/11/23
• Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Greg Connor, 2004/11/23
  • Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/23
• Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/11/25
  • I told you so (Thunderbird stupidity), Chris Drake, 2004/11/25
    • Re: I told you so (Thunderbird stupidity), Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/11/25
    • Re: Re: I told you so (Thunderbird stupidity), wayne, 2004/11/25
    • Re: I told you so (Thunderbird stupidity), Raymond Neeves, 2004/11/25
  • Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, wayne, 2004/11/25
  • RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, terry, 2004/11/25
    • RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, James Couzens, 2004/11/25
    • RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, James Couzens, 2004/11/25
    • RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Julian Mehnle, 2004/11/25
    • RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Roger Moser, 2004/11/25
    • RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, terry, 2004/11/26
    • RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Roger Moser, 2004/11/26
    • RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Richard Bang, 2004/11/26
    • Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/26
    • RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Richard Bang, 2004/11/26
    • Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/29
    • RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, James Couzens, 2004/11/26
    • RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Julian Mehnle, 2004/11/26
    • RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, James Couzens, 2004/11/26
    • RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Julian Mehnle, 2004/11/26
    • RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, James Couzens, 2004/11/26
    • RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, terry, 2004/11/26
    • RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, James Couzens, 2004/11/26
    • Re[2]: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Peter Snow, 2004/11/26
    • Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/26
    • Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Peter Bowyer, 2004/11/25
    • Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/11/29
    • Re: Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/29
    • Re: Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/29
    • RE: Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, terry, 2004/11/29
• RE: Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/29
  • Re: Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Peter Bowyer, 2004/11/29
    • Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/11/29
  • Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/29

update of "welcome to the list" message, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/22

• Re: update of "welcome to the list" message, Chris Haynes, 2004/11/22
  • Re: update of "welcome to the list" message, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/22
    • Re: update of "welcome to the list" message, Greg Connor, 2004/11/23
    • Re: update of "welcome to the list" message, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/23
    • Re: update of "welcome to the list" message, James Couzens, 2004/11/23
  • Re: update of "welcome to the list" message, James Couzens, 2004/11/22
• RE: update of "welcome to the list" message, terry, 2004/11/22
  • Re: update of "welcome to the list" message, wayne, 2004/11/23
• Re: update of "welcome to the list" message, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/23

MUAs checking SPF, Andy Bakun, 2004/11/22

• Re: MUAs checking SPF, Hannah Schroeter, 2004/11/22
  • Re: MUAs checking SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Re: MUAs checking SPF, Andy Bakun, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Re: MUAs checking SPF, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/22
    • Re: MUAs checking SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/22

Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/21

• Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/21
  • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Roger Moser, 2004/11/21
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/21
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Chuck Mead, 2004/11/21
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Chuck Mead, 2004/11/21
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/21
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Chuck Mead, 2004/11/21
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/21
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Chuck Mead, 2004/11/21
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/22
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Bruce Barnes, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Jeff Macdonald, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Tony Finch, 2004/11/21
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Chuck Mead, 2004/11/21
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, terry, 2004/11/21
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/22
  • RE: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, terry, 2004/11/21
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/21
• Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/21
  • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Roger Moser, 2004/11/21
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/22

RE: OT - Telephone Caller ID, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/20

• RE: OT - Telephone Caller ID, Seth Goodman, 2004/11/21
  • RE: OT - Telephone Caller ID, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/21
    • Re: OT - Telephone Caller ID, Douglas K. Fischer, 2004/11/24

Sendmail white paper, Roy Badami, 2004/11/20

• Re: Sendmail white paper, Michael Weiner, 2004/11/20
  • Re: Sendmail white paper, Chuck Mead, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Chuck Mead, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Michael Weiner, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Chuck Mead, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/22
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, Mark, 2004/11/20
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, George Schlossnagle, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, wayne, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, George Schlossnagle, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Tony Finch, 2004/11/21
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Tony Finch, 2004/11/21
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, Mark, 2004/11/20
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, Roger Moser, 2004/11/20
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/22
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, Mark, 2004/11/22
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/22
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, Stephen Pollei, 2004/11/22
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, Mark, 2004/11/22
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, Mark, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, wayne, 2004/11/22
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, Mark, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/23
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/23
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, Mark, 2004/11/23
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/23
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, terry, 2004/11/23
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/23
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, Mark, 2004/11/23
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Chris Haynes, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/24
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, Richard Bang, 2004/11/24
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, Mark, 2004/11/24
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/24
    • Phishing in the news.., jpinkerton, 2004/11/24
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, Stephen Pollei, 2004/11/24
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, wayne, 2004/11/24
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/24
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, Stephen Pollei, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Andy Bakun, 2004/11/24
    • Proposed policy on Forwarding. (Was: Re: Sendmail white paper), Chris Haynes, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding. (Was: Re: Sendmail white, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/11/24
    • RE: Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding. (Was: Re: Sendmail white, Mark, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding. (Was: Re: Sendma, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding, Chris Haynes, 2004/11/25
    • Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/25
    • Re: Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding, Andy Bakun, 2004/11/26
    • Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/26
    • Re: Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding, Andy Bakun, 2004/11/27
    • Re: Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding, Jim Hill, 2004/11/27
    • Re: Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding, Shane Rush, 2004/11/27
    • Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/27
    • implementing forwarding via ODMR (was Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding), Andy Bakun, 2004/11/28
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, terry, 2004/11/23
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, Mark, 2004/11/23
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/23
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/23
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/23
    • RE: Re: Sendmail white paper, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/23
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/23
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/23
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, wayne, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Daniel Taylor, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/11/23
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, Richard Bang, 2004/11/24
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/24
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, Richard Bang, 2004/11/24
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, Bruce Barnes, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, George Schlossnagle, 2004/11/24
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/24
    • Re: [STOP THREAD] Sendmail white paper (which is really about forwarding and -all), Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/24
    • Re: [STOP THREAD] Sendmail white paper (which is really about forwarding and -all), Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/24
    • Re: [STOP THREAD] Sendmail white paper (which is really about forwarding and -all), Greg Connor, 2004/11/24
    • Re: [STOP THREAD] Sendmail white paper (which is really about forwarding and -all), jpinkerton, 2004/11/25
    • Re: [STOP THREAD] Sendmail white paper (which is really about forwarding and -all), James Couzens, 2004/11/26
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Michael Weiner, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Michael Weiner, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, wayne, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Michael Weiner, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Michael Weiner, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Roger Moser, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Douglas K. Fischer, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Roger Moser, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Michael Weiner, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Michael Weiner, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Chuck Mead, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Michael Weiner, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, M Z R, 2004/11/21
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/11/21
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, M Z R, 2004/11/21
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, terry, 2004/11/21
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, M Z R, 2004/11/21
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, terry, 2004/11/21
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, wayne, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, James Couzens, 2004/11/21
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, wayne, 2004/11/21
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Chuck Mead, 2004/11/21
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, terry, 2004/11/21
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/23
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, Greg Connor, 2004/11/23
    • RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/23
• Re: Sendmail white paper, wayne, 2004/11/22
  • Re: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/23
  • Re: Sendmail white paper, Rand Wacker, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, James Couzens, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Michael Hammer, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Michael Weiner, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Michael Hammer, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, James Couzens, 2004/11/26
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/26
    • "worm spam" and SPF, Fridrik Skulason, 2004/11/26
    • Re: "worm spam" and SPF, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/26
    • Re: "worm spam" and SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/26
    • Re: "worm spam" and SPF, Peter Snow, 2004/11/26
    • Re: "worm spam" and SPF, Fridrik Skulason, 2004/11/26
    • Re: "worm spam" and SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/28
    • My notes from FTC Summit with statistics (was: Sendmail white paper), william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/26
    • Re: My notes from FTC Summit with statistics (was: Sendmail white paper), David Woodhouse, 2004/11/26
    • Re: My notes from FTC Summit with statistics (was: Sendmail white paper), william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/26
    • Re: My notes from FTC Summit with statistics (was: Sendmail white paper), Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/26
    • portent.listbox.com, Richard Bang, 2004/11/26
    • RE: portent.listbox.com, Mark, 2004/11/26
    • RE: portent.listbox.com, Richard Bang, 2004/11/26
    • Re: My notes from FTC Summit with statistics (was: Sendmail white paper), David Woodhouse, 2004/11/26
    • Re: My notes from FTC Summit with statistics (was: Sendmail white paper), william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/26
    • Re: My notes from FTC Summit with statistics (was: Sendmail white paper), william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/26
    • Re: My notes from FTC Summit with statistics, Rand Wacker, 2004/11/26
    • Re: Re: My notes from FTC Summit with statistics, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/26
    • RE: Re: My notes from FTC Summit with statistics, terry, 2004/11/26
    • Re: Re: My notes from FTC Summit with statistics, Stephen Pollei, 2004/11/26
    • Re: Re: My notes from FTC Summit with statistics, Rand Wacker, 2004/11/26
    • Re: My notes from FTC Summit with statistics, wayne, 2004/11/26
    • Attacking Domain Keys, James Couzens, 2004/11/26
    • Re: Attacking Domain Keys, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/26
    • Re: Attacking Domain Keys, James Couzens, 2004/11/26
    • Re: Attacking Domain Keys, George Schlossnagle, 2004/11/26
    • Re: Attacking Domain Keys, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/11/26
    • Re: Attacking Domain Keys, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/26
    • Re: Attacking Domain Keys, James Couzens, 2004/11/26
    • Re: Attacking Domain Keys, George Schlossnagle, 2004/11/26
    • Re: Attacking Domain Keys, James Couzens, 2004/11/26
    • Re: Attacking Domain Keys, George Schlossnagle, 2004/11/26
    • RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Seth Goodman, 2004/11/29
    • Re: Attacking Domain Keys, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/11/29
    • RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Seth Goodman, 2004/11/29
    • Re: Attacking Domain Keys, George Schlossnagle, 2004/11/29
    • RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Seth Goodman, 2004/11/29
    • Re: Attacking Domain Keys, George Schlossnagle, 2004/11/29
    • RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Seth Goodman, 2004/11/29
    • RE: Attacking Domain Keys, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/29
    • RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Seth Goodman, 2004/11/29
    • Re: Attacking Domain Keys, George Schlossnagle, 2004/11/29
    • RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Seth Goodman, 2004/11/29
    • RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/11/29
    • RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Roger Moser, 2004/11/30
    • Re: Attacking Domain Keys, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/11/30
    • Re: Attacking Domain Keys, Roger Moser, 2004/11/30
    • Re: Attacking Domain Keys, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/11/30
    • Re: Attacking Domain Keys, Roger Moser, 2004/11/30
    • Re: Attacking Domain Keys, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/11/26
    • RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Seth Goodman, 2004/11/29
    • we're not deaf (was: Attacking Domain Keys), Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/29
    • RE: we're not deaf (was: Attacking Domain Keys), Seth Goodman, 2004/11/29
    • Re: we're not deaf, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/29
    • RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/11/29
    • Re: Attacking Domain Keys, wayne, 2004/11/29
    • RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Seth Goodman, 2004/11/29
    • Re: Attacking Domain Keys, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/30
    • Re: Attacking Domain Keys, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/30
    • Re: Attacking Domain Keys, Greg Connor, 2004/11/30
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Michael Hammer, 2004/11/26
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Rand Wacker, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, James Couzens, 2004/11/26
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, wayne, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Sendmail white paper, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/24
• RE: Sendmail white paper, MW Mike Weiner (5028), 2004/11/21
  • Re: Sendmail white paper, Fridrik Skulason, 2004/11/21
• RE: Sendmail white paper, Stefan Engelbert, 2004/11/22

Re: draft-schlitt-spf-01 now available, wayne, 2004/11/19

• Re: draft-schlitt-spf-01 now available, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/20
  • Re: Re: draft-schlitt-spf-01 now available, wayne, 2004/11/20
    • Re: draft-schlitt-spf-01 now available, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/22
• Re: draft-schlitt-spf-01 now available, Roger Moser, 2004/11/20
  • Re: draft-schlitt-spf-01 now available, wayne, 2004/11/20
    • Re: draft-schlitt-spf-01 now available, Roger Moser, 2004/11/20
    • RE: draft-schlitt-spf-01 now available, terry, 2004/11/21
    • RE: draft-schlitt-spf-01 now available, Stephen Pollei, 2004/11/21
    • RE: draft-schlitt-spf-01 now available, terry, 2004/11/21

MAAWG Whitepaper that you can READ! (PS/HTML formats), James Couzens, 2004/11/19

• Re: MAAWG Whitepaper that you can READ! (PS/HTML formats), Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/19
  • Re: MAAWG Whitepaper that you can READ! (PS/HTML formats), Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/19

Dynamic Senders List (aka SPF Whitelist), Brian Barrios, 2004/11/19

• FW: Dynamic Senders List (aka SPF Whitelist), Brian Barrios, 2004/11/19
  • Re: Dynamic Senders List (aka SPF Whitelist), Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/19
    • RE: Re: Dynamic Senders List (aka SPF Whitelist), Brian Barrios, 2004/11/19
  • Re: FW: Dynamic Senders List (aka SPF Whitelist), wayne, 2004/11/19
    • RE: FW: Dynamic Senders List (aka SPF Whitelist), Brian Barrios, 2004/11/19
    • Re: FW: Dynamic Senders List (aka SPF Whitelist), Shane Rush, 2004/11/19

TXT lookup problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/11/19

• Re: TXT lookup problem, wayne, 2004/11/19
• Re: TXT lookup problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/11/19
• RE: TXT lookup problem, Mark, 2004/11/19
  • Re: TXT lookup problem, wayne, 2004/11/19
• Re: TXT lookup problem, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/19
• RE: TXT lookup problem, Stefan Engelbert, 2004/11/19
  • RE: TXT lookup problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/11/19
• RE: TXT lookup problem, Stefan Engelbert, 2004/11/19
  • RE: TXT lookup problem, Mark, 2004/11/19
    • Re: TXT lookup problem, wayne, 2004/11/19
    • Re: TXT lookup problem, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/19
    • RE: TXT lookup problem, Mark, 2004/11/19

RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Mark, 2004/11/19

• RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/21
  • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Daniel Taylor, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Daniel Taylor, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Daniel Taylor, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, George Schlossnagle, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Daniel Taylor, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Daniel Taylor, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Daniel Taylor, 2004/11/23
• Forwarding is spoofing Was: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/22
  • Re: Forwarding is spoofing Was: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/22
    • RE: Forwarding is spoofing Was: ElectronicFrontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Bruce Barnes, 2004/11/22
    • RE: Forwarding is spoofing Was: ElectronicFrontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, David Woodhouse, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Forwarding is spoofing Was: ElectronicFrontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Hannah Schroeter, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Forwarding is spoofing Was: ElectronicFrontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/22
    • RE: Forwarding is spoofing Was: ElectronicFrontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Bruce Barnes, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Forwarding is spoofing, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/23
    • RE: Forwarding is spoofing Was: ElectronicFrontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Richard Bang, 2004/11/22
    • RE: Forwarding is spoofing Was: ElectronicFrontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Tony Finch, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Forwarding is spoofing Was: ElectronicFrontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Hannah Schroeter, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Forwarding is spoofing Was: ElectronicFrontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Forwarding is spoofing Was: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, wayne, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Forwarding is spoofing, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Forwarding is spoofing Was: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Tony Finch, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Forwarding is spoofing, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/22
  • RE: Forwarding is spoofing Was: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Mark, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Forwarding is spoofing Was: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Forwarding is spoofing, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/23

MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/18

• Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/18
• RE: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Guy, 2004/11/18
  • Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/18
    • Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/19
    • Re: Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/11/19
    • Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Chris Haynes, 2004/11/19
    • Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Chris Haynes, 2004/11/19
  • Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/18
    • Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Rene Barbier, 2004/11/19
    • Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/19
    • Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Jim Hill, 2004/11/19
  • Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, jpinkerton, 2004/11/19
• Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, James Couzens, 2004/11/19
• Comments on MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/19
• Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/19
• RE: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Mark, 2004/11/19
  • Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/19

RE: MEDIA: Is Microsoft Ready to Assert IP Rights o ver the Internet?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/17

• Re: MEDIA: Is Microsoft Ready to Assert IP Rights over the Internet?, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/11/18
• RE: MEDIA: Is Microsoft Ready to Assert IP Rights o ver the Internet?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/19

MEDIA: Is Microsoft Ready to Assert IP Rights over the Internet?, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/17

• Re: MEDIA: Is Microsoft Ready to Assert IP Rights over the Internet?, Alan Madill, 2004/11/17
  • Re: MEDIA: Is Microsoft Ready to Assert IP Rights over the Internet?, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/17
    • Re: MEDIA: Is Microsoft Ready to Assert IP Rights over the Internet?, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/17
  • Re: MEDIA: Is Microsoft Ready to Assert IP Rights over the Internet?, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/18

RE: SPF too late?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/17

• Re: SPF too late?, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/18

New US Law On Anti-Trust And Standards Bodies, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/17

• Re: New US Law On Anti-Trust And Standards Bodies, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/17
  • RE: New US Law On Anti-Trust And Standards Bodies, Mark, 2004/11/17
    • Re: New US Law On Anti-Trust And Standards Bodies, Michael Hammer, 2004/11/17
• RE: New US Law On Anti-Trust And Standards Bodies, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/17
  • Re: New US Law On Anti-Trust And Standards Bodies, Michael Hammer, 2004/11/17
• RE: New US Law On Anti-Trust And Standards Bodies, Jon Bertrand, 2004/11/18

Campaign: If elected I will ..., william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/16

• Campaign: If elected I will ..., Mark Shewmaker, 2004/11/24

MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Boyd Lynn Gerber, 2004/11/16

• Re: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, jdoupe+spf, 2004/11/16
• Re: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Chuck Mead, 2004/11/16
  • Re: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Michael Weiner, 2004/11/16
    • Re: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Chuck Mead, 2004/11/16
    • Re: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Chuck Mead, 2004/11/16
    • Re: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Michael Weiner, 2004/11/16
    • Re: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Chuck Mead, 2004/11/16
    • RE: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Guy, 2004/11/16
    • Re: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Chuck Mead, 2004/11/16
    • RE: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Guy, 2004/11/16
    • Re: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Michael Weiner, 2004/11/16
    • RE: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Guy, 2004/11/16
    • Re: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Michael Weiner, 2004/11/16
    • Re: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Chuck Mead, 2004/11/16

Fw: Resignation, jpinkerton, 2004/11/16

• Re: Fw: Resignation, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/16
  • SPF too late?, Chris Drake, 2004/11/16
    • RE: SPF too late?, Julian Mehnle, 2004/11/16
    • Re: SPF too late?, Fridrik Skulason, 2004/11/17
    • Voting testers please, jpinkerton, 2004/11/17
    • Re: Voting testers please, jpinkerton, 2004/11/17
    • Re: Voting testers please, jpinkerton, 2004/11/17
    • Re: Voting testers please, jpinkerton, 2004/11/17
    • RE: Voting testers please, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/17
    • RE: Voting testers please, Julian Mehnle, 2004/11/17
    • RE: Voting testers please, terry, 2004/11/17
    • Re: Voting testers please, jpinkerton, 2004/11/17
    • Re: Voting testers please, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/17
    • RE: Voting testers please, Julian Mehnle, 2004/11/17
    • Re: Voting testers please, Marc Kool, 2004/11/18
    • RE: Voting testers please, Julian Mehnle, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Voting testers please, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Re: Voting testers please, jpinkerton, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Voting testers please, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Voting testers please, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Voting testers please, Michael Hammer, 2004/11/18
    • Re: SPF too late?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/11/17
    • RE: SPF too late?, Seth Goodman, 2004/11/17
    • Re: SPF too late?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/17
    • Re[2]: SPF too late?, Chris Drake, 2004/11/20
    • RE: Re[2]: SPF too late?, Seth Goodman, 2004/11/21

Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00 now available, wayne, 2004/11/15

• Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00 now available, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/15

I am not back (yet), Koen Martens, 2004/11/15

• Re: I am not back (yet), James Couzens, 2004/11/15

Re: Digest 1.631 for spf-discuss, Koen Martens, 2004/11/15

• Re: Digest 1.631 for spf-discuss, Shane Rush, 2004/11/15

Please remove me as council candidate, James Couzens, 2004/11/15

• Re: Please remove me as council candidate, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/15
  • Re: Re: Please remove me as council candidate, James Couzens, 2004/11/15
    • Re: Please remove me as council candidate, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/15
    • Re: Re: Please remove me as council candidate, James Couzens, 2004/11/15
    • Build on the work of others (was: Please remove me as council candidate), Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/15
    • Re: Re: Please remove me as council candidate, wayne, 2004/11/15

Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/15

• Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), jpinkerton, 2004/11/15
  • Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), James Couzens, 2004/11/15
  • Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), Greg Connor, 2004/11/15
  • Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/15
    • Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), Greg Connor, 2004/11/15
    • RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 142004), terry, 2004/11/15
    • Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/15
    • Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/15
    • Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), Mark Shewmaker, 2004/11/15
    • Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov14 2004), Mark, 2004/11/15
    • Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov14 2004), Mark, 2004/11/15
    • Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov14 2004), Michael Hammer, 2004/11/15
    • Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov14 2004), jpinkerton, 2004/11/16
    • Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov14 2004), william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/16
    • Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov14 2004), Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/11/16
    • Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/16
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/16
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Michael Hammer, 2004/11/16
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/16
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/16
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/16
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Michael Hammer, 2004/11/16
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/16
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/16
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/16
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Hannah Schroeter, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Dave Crocker, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Dave Crocker, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Michael Hammer, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Dave Crocker, 2004/11/18
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Guy, 2004/11/18
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Dave Crocker, 2004/11/18
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Guy, 2004/11/19
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Mark, 2004/11/19
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/11/19
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Benjamin Franz, 2004/11/19
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/11/19
    • OT - Telephone Caller ID, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/19
    • Re: OT - Telephone Caller ID, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/11/19
    • Re: OT - Telephone Caller ID, Benjamin Franz, 2004/11/20
    • Re: OT - Telephone Caller ID, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/11/20
    • Re: OT - Telephone Caller ID, John A. Martin, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Re: OT - Telephone Caller ID, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/11/20
    • Re: OT - Telephone Caller ID, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Benjamin Franz, 2004/11/19
    • OT -- Caller-Id forge -- was ... EFF ... Mentions SPF, Stephen Pollei, 2004/11/19
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Vivien M., 2004/11/19
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/11/19
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Vivien M., 2004/11/19
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Bruce Barnes, 2004/11/19
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/19
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, wayne, 2004/11/19
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/11/19
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Benjamin Franz, 2004/11/19
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/19
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Shane Rush, 2004/11/19
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Graham Murray, 2004/11/21
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Shane Rush, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/19
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Shane Rush, 2004/11/19
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Sander Steffann, 2004/11/19
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Nick Phillips, 2004/11/19
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Dave Crocker, 2004/11/19
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Nick Phillips, 2004/11/19
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Greg Connor, 2004/11/19
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Dave Crocker, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Greg Connor, 2004/11/20
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Guy, 2004/11/19
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/19
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Guy, 2004/11/19
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Vivien M., 2004/11/20
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Personal attacks, Greg Connor, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Personal attacks, Chuck Mead, 2004/11/20
    • CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL, jpinkerton, 2004/11/22
    • Re: CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL, wayne, 2004/11/22
    • Re: CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/22
    • Re: CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL, jpinkerton, 2004/11/23
    • Re: CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL, jpinkerton, 2004/11/23
    • Re: CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL, James Couzens, 2004/11/23
    • Re: CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Dave Crocker, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Dave Crocker, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, wayne, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, wayne, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/18
    • RE: Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Mark, 2004/11/18
    • RE: Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Mark, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/18
    • RE: Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Mark, 2004/11/18
    • RE: Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Mark, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Dave Crocker, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/19
    • Re: Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Michael Hammer, 2004/11/19
    • Re: Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, wayne, 2004/11/18
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Greg Connor, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/19
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, terry, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, jpinkerton, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/19
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Mark, 2004/11/18
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Vivien M., 2004/11/18
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, jpinkerton, 2004/11/18
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Vivien M., 2004/11/18
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/11/18
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Vivien M., 2004/11/18
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Michael Hammer, 2004/11/19
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Mark, 2004/11/18
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, wayne, 2004/11/18
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Greg Connor, 2004/11/18
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Vivien M., 2004/11/19
    • using both SPF and DomainKeys, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/19
    • Re: using both SPF and DomainKeys, Michael Weiner, 2004/11/19
    • Unknown mechanisms in SPF, wayne, 2004/11/19
    • Re: Unknown mechanisms in SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/20
    • using both SPF and DomainKeys, Roger Moser, 2004/11/20
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Greg Connor, 2004/11/19
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, wayne, 2004/11/19
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Hannah Schroeter, 2004/11/22
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/22
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Mark, 2004/11/22
    • RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, terry, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Michael Hammer, 2004/11/22
    • Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Benjamin Franz, 2004/11/18
    • RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov14 2004), Julian Mehnle, 2004/11/16
    • RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov14 2004), Greg Connor, 2004/11/16
    • Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov14 2004), Greg Connor, 2004/11/16
    • Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov14 2004), Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/11/16
    • Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/16
    • RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), Julian Mehnle, 2004/11/16
    • RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/16
    • RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), Julian Mehnle, 2004/11/16
    • RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), Guy, 2004/11/16
    • RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/16
    • RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), Guy, 2004/11/18
    • RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), Guy, 2004/11/18
    • RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), terry, 2004/11/20
    • RE: Initial Voting Procedures, Stephen Pollei, 2004/11/20
    • Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), jpinkerton, 2004/11/22
    • Initial Voting Procedures - Voting for yourself, jpinkerton, 2004/11/22
    • RE: Initial Voting Procedures - Voting for yourself, Mark, 2004/11/22
    • RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/16
  • RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), Julian Mehnle, 2004/11/15
• Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), Jonathan Gardner, 2004/11/15
  • Softfail problem at Amazon, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/11/18
    • RE: Softfail problem at Amazon, Guy, 2004/11/19
    • RE: Softfail problem at Amazon, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/11/19
    • RE: Softfail problem at Amazon, Guy, 2004/11/19
    • RE: Softfail problem at Amazon, James Couzens, 2004/11/19
    • Re: Softfail problem at Amazon, Carl Hutzler, 2004/11/19

Prefer all these polls and elections on another channel., Boyd Lynn Gerber, 2004/11/14

• Re: Prefer all these polls and elections on another channel., Shane Rush, 2004/11/14

Campaign: If elected I will..., Julian Mehnle, 2004/11/14

• Re: Campaign: If elected I will..., Greg Connor, 2004/11/15
• Campaign: If elected I will..., Mark, 2004/11/14

Fw: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 2004/11/14

• Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council" - acceptance deadline, jpinkerton, 2004/11/14
• Re: Fw: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/14
  • Re: Fw: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 2004/11/14

Poll on Organizing the Council, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/13

• Re: Poll on Organizing the Council, csm, 2004/11/13
• Re: Poll on Organizing the Council, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/13
• Re: Poll on Organizing the Council, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/13
  • Re: Poll on Organizing the Council, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/13
• Re: Poll on Organizing the Council, Greg Connor, 2004/11/13
• Re: Poll on Organizing the Council, wayne, 2004/11/13
• Re: Poll on Organizing the Council, Douglas K. Fischer, 2004/11/13
• RE: Poll on Organizing the Council, terry, 2004/11/13
• Re: Poll on Organizing the Council, Paul Ficinski, 2004/11/14
• Re: Poll on Organizing the Council, Rene Barbier, 2004/11/15
  • List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 2004/11/16
• Re: Poll on Organizing the Council, James Couzens, 2004/11/15
• Poll on Organizing the Council, Koen Martens, 2004/11/14

Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/13

• Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 2004/11/13
  • Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/13
    • Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/13
    • Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/13
    • Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/13
    • Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Greg Connor, 2004/11/14
    • Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/14
    • Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Boyd Lynn Gerber, 2004/11/14
    • Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", wayne, 2004/11/14
    • RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Guy, 2004/11/14
    • Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", John A. Martin, 2004/11/14
    • Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Greg Connor, 2004/11/14
    • Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Greg Connor, 2004/11/15
    • RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/15
    • RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the"SPF Leadership Council", terry, 2004/11/14
    • Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Shane Rush, 2004/11/14
    • RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Julian Mehnle, 2004/11/14
    • Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 2004/11/14
    • Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Shane Rush, 2004/11/14
    • Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Shane Rush, 2004/11/14
    • RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Julian Mehnle, 2004/11/14
    • Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/14
    • RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Julian Mehnle, 2004/11/14
    • RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Guy, 2004/11/14
    • RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/14
    • RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Julian Mehnle, 2004/11/15
    • RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/15
    • RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Julian Mehnle, 2004/11/15
    • RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/15
    • RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Julian Mehnle, 2004/11/15
    • Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/15
    • Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/16
    • RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Julian Mehnle, 2004/11/16
    • Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/16
    • RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Julian Mehnle, 2004/11/16
    • RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Guy, 2004/11/16
    • List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 2004/11/17
    • Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 2004/11/17
    • RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/16
    • Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/16
    • Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/16
    • RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Julian Mehnle, 2004/11/15
• Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/13
• List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 2004/11/14
  • Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Hector Santos, 2004/11/15
• Fw: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 2004/11/21

who should be able to vote?, wayne, 2004/11/12

• RE: who should be able to vote?, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/12
  • Re: who should be able to vote?, wayne, 2004/11/12
    • Re: who should be able to vote?, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/12
    • Re: who should be able to vote?, John A. Martin, 2004/11/13
• Re: who should be able to vote?, Philip Larkin Waters, 2004/11/12
  • RE: who should be able to vote?, Guy, 2004/11/12
    • Re: who should be able to vote?, jpinkerton, 2004/11/12
    • Re: who should be able to vote?, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/12
  • Re: who should be able to vote?, Shane Rush, 2004/11/12
    • RE: who should be able to vote?, guy, 2004/11/12
    • Re: who should be able to vote?, Shane Rush, 2004/11/12
• Re: who should be able to vote?, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/12
  • Re: who should be able to vote?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/12
    • RE: who should be able to vote?, Guy, 2004/11/12
    • RE: who should be able to vote?, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/13
    • RE: who should be able to vote?, Seth Goodman, 2004/11/13
    • RE: who should be able to vote?, Greg Connor, 2004/11/13
    • Re: who should be able to vote?, jpinkerton, 2004/11/13
    • Re: who should be able to vote?, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/13
• Re: who should be able to vote?, wayne, 2004/11/12
  • Re: who should be able to vote?, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/12
    • Re: who should be able to vote?, jdoupe+spf, 2004/11/12
• RE: who should be able to vote?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/12
  • Re: who should be able to vote?, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/13

Nomination that was previously omitted (silly of us actually)!, csm, 2004/11/12

• Re: Nomination that was previously omitted (silly of us actually)!, jpinkerton, 2004/11/12
  • Re: Nomination that was previously omitted (silly of us actually)!, csm, 2004/11/12

RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SP F, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/12

• RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SP F, csm, 2004/11/12

include: enhancement suggestion, Commerco WebMaster, 2004/11/12

• RE: include: enhancement suggestion, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/12
• Re: include: enhancement suggestion, Greg Connor, 2004/11/12

RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "S PF Leadership Council", Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/12

• Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "S PF Leadership Council", Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/12
• Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 2004/11/12

Accountable Messaging Standards Group, csm, 2004/11/12

• Re: Accountable Messaging Standards Group, Dave Crocker, 2004/11/12
  • Re: Accountable Messaging Standards Group, csm, 2004/11/12
  • Re: Accountable Messaging Standards Group, Michael Hammer, 2004/11/12
    • Re: Accountable Messaging Standards Group, jpinkerton, 2004/11/12
    • Re: Accountable Messaging Standards Group, Dave Crocker, 2004/11/12
  • Re: Accountable Messaging Standards Group, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/12
    • Re: Accountable Messaging Standards Group, jpinkerton, 2004/11/12
    • Re: Accountable Messaging Standards Group, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/12
• RE: Accountable Messaging Standards Group, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/12
  • RE: Accountable Messaging Standards Group, Dave Crocker, 2004/11/12
• RE: Accountable Messaging Standards Group, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/12
  • RE: Accountable Messaging Standards Group, Dave Crocker, 2004/11/12

AOL testing., wayne, 2004/11/11

• RE: AOL testing., John Glube, 2004/11/12
  • Re: AOL testing., wayne, 2004/11/12
    • Re: AOL testing., James Couzens, 2004/11/12

RE: SPF leadership council nominees: please accept or decline, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/11

• Re: SPF leadership council nominees: please accept or decline, wayne, 2004/11/12
• Re: SPF leadership council nominees: please accept or decline, wayne, 2004/11/12

SPF leadership council nominees: please accept or decline, wayne, 2004/11/11

• Re: SPF leadership council nominees: please accept or decline, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/11
  • RE: SPF leadership council nominees: please acceptor decline, terry, 2004/11/12
    • Some discussion on legal form., csm, 2004/11/12
    • RE: SPF leadership council nominees: please acceptor decline, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/12
  • Re: SPF leadership council nominees: please accept or decline, jpinkerton, 2004/11/12
• SPF leadership council nominees: please accept or decline, Roger Moser, 2004/11/11
  • Re: SPF leadership council nominees: please accept or decline, jpinkerton, 2004/11/12
• Re: SPF leadership council nominees: please accept or decline, Greg Connor, 2004/11/12
• RE: SPF leadership council nominees: please accept or decline, Seth Goodman, 2004/11/12
  • RE: SPF leadership council nominees: please accept or decline, csm, 2004/11/12
• Re: SPF leadership council nominees: please accept or decline, Shevek, 2004/11/12

RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SP F, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/11

• Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SP F, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/11
• RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SP F, James Couzens, 2004/11/12
• Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, jpinkerton, 2004/11/12
• RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SP F, csm, 2004/11/12
• RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SP F, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/12
  • RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SP F, csm, 2004/11/12
• RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SP F, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/14
• RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SP F, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/14
• RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SP F, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/23
  • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/23

MS may have fixed their SenderID/SPF wizard, wayne, 2004/11/11

• Re: MS may have fixed their SenderID/SPF wizard - Not, jpinkerton, 2004/11/11
  • Off list re: MS may have fixed their SenderID/SPF wizard - Not, John Glube, 2004/11/11
    • Re: MS may have fixed their SenderID/SPF wizard - Not, jpinkerton, 2004/11/11
    • Re: MS may have fixed their SenderID/SPF wizard - Not, Andy Bakun, 2004/11/11

[IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/11/11

• Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, wayne, 2004/11/11
  • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, csm, 2004/11/11
    • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, James Couzens, 2004/11/11
    • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, B. Johannessen, 2004/11/11
    • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, csm, 2004/11/11
    • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, wayne, 2004/11/11
    • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Greg Connor, 2004/11/12
    • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, csm, 2004/11/11
  • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/11
  • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/11/11
• Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, jpinkerton, 2004/11/11
  • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/11
    • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/11/11
    • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/11
    • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/11
    • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, wayne, 2004/11/11
    • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Roger Moser, 2004/11/11
    • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/12
    • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Greg Connor, 2004/11/11
• Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/11/23
  • Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, jpinkerton, 2004/11/23
  • RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, terry, 2004/11/23
  • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, wayne, 2004/11/23
    • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Greg Connor, 2004/11/23
    • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/23
    • RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, terry, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Greg Connor, 2004/11/23
    • Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Roger Moser, 2004/11/24
    • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/11/24
    • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Roger Moser, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, wayne, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Roger Moser, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, wayne, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Roger Moser, 2004/11/24
    • Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Roger Moser, 2004/11/24
    • RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Guy, 2004/11/24
    • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/24
• RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/11
  • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, wayne, 2004/11/11
    • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, jpinkerton, 2004/11/11
  • RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/11
  • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/11
• RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/11
  • RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/11
    • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/12
    • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, jpinkerton, 2004/11/12
• RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/11
• RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/12
  • RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, terry, 2004/11/13
• RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Roger Moser, 2004/11/12
• RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/12
• RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Roger Moser, 2004/11/13
  • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/13
• RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/13
  • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/13
  • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/14
• RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, administrator, 2004/11/13
  • RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Guy, 2004/11/13
• RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/13
  • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/13
    • Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Greg Connor, 2004/11/13
    • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/13
  • RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Guy, 2004/11/13
• RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, administrator, 2004/11/14
• RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/15
  • Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/16

support web forum wording (Meng, read this), Koen Martens, 2004/11/10

• RE: support web forum wording (Meng, read this), Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/19

Odd Problem, Matt, 2004/11/10

• About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, guy, 2004/11/10
  • Re: About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, jpinkerton, 2004/11/10
    • RE: About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, Guy, 2004/11/10
    • RE: About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/10
    • RE: About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, Dave Crocker, 2004/11/10
    • Re: About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, wayne, 2004/11/10
    • Re: About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/11
    • Re: About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, wayne, 2004/11/11
    • Re: About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, David, 2004/11/11
    • Re: About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, wayne, 2004/11/10
  • Re: About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, csm, 2004/11/10
  • Re: About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/10
    • Re: About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, wayne, 2004/11/10
• Re: Odd Problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/11/10
  • Re: Odd Problem, James Couzens, 2004/11/11
    • Re: Odd Problem, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/11
    • Re: Odd Problem, wayne, 2004/11/11
    • Re: Odd Problem, Matt, 2004/11/11
    • Re: Odd Problem, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/11
    • Re: Odd Problem, James Couzens, 2004/11/11
    • Re: Odd Problem, Matt, 2004/11/12
    • RE: Odd Problem, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/12
    • Re: Odd Problem, James Couzens, 2004/11/12
    • Re: Odd Problem, Matt, 2004/11/12
    • RE: Odd Problem, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/12
    • RE: Odd Problem, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/12
    • Re: Odd Problem, Matt, 2004/11/12
    • Re: Odd Problem, Greg Connor, 2004/11/12
    • RE: Odd Problem, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/12
    • RE: Odd Problem, James Couzens, 2004/11/12
    • RE: Odd Problem, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/12
    • Re: Odd Problem, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/11/12
    • Re: Odd Problem, James Couzens, 2004/11/12
• Re: Odd Problem, Commerco WebMaster, 2004/11/12

Reminder about meeting 6:30pm today, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/10

• Re: Reminder about meeting 6:30pm today, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/10

RE: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council", Stefan Engelbert, 2004/11/10

• RE: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council", Stefan Engelbert, 2004/11/10
  • RE: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council", Andriy G . Tereshchenko, 2004/11/10
    • Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council" - chat., jpinkerton, 2004/11/10
  • Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council", Jeremy Pullicino, 2004/11/10

OpenSPF.org "main page" wording -- please pick apart, James, 2004/11/10

• Re: OpenSPF.org "main page" wording -- please pick apart, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/10
• Re: OpenSPF.org "main page" wording -- please pick apart, Adrian Midgley, 2004/11/10

spf position on sid for summit, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/09

• Re: spf position on sid for summit, Shane Rush, 2004/11/09

SRS/SES mailing lists?, Paul Iadonisi, 2004/11/09

• Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Tony Finch, 2004/11/09
• Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, James Couzens, 2004/11/09
• Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, David, 2004/11/09
  • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/09
    • RE: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Seth Goodman, 2004/11/09
    • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/10
    • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, James Couzens, 2004/11/10
    • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, David, 2004/11/10
    • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, James Couzens, 2004/11/11
    • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/11/10
    • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, David, 2004/11/10
    • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, David, 2004/11/10
    • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, wayne, 2004/11/10
    • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, David, 2004/11/11
    • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, wayne, 2004/11/11
    • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, David, 2004/11/11
    • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, wayne, 2004/11/11
    • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Tony Finch, 2004/11/11
    • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, David, 2004/11/11
    • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, jpinkerton, 2004/11/11
    • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, David, 2004/11/12
    • RE: SRS/SES mailing lists?, terry, 2004/11/12
    • RE: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Seth Goodman, 2004/11/12
    • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Roger Moser, 2004/11/11
    • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, David, 2004/11/12
    • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Roger Moser, 2004/11/12
    • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, David, 2004/11/12
    • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, James Couzens, 2004/11/11
    • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Tony Finch, 2004/11/11
  • Microsoft claims the senderID license is free., Guy, 2004/11/09
• Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, wayne, 2004/11/09
  • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, jpinkerton, 2004/11/09
    • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/11/09
  • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Hannah Schroeter, 2004/11/10
    • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Tony Finch, 2004/11/10
    • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Hannah Schroeter, 2004/11/10
• RE: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Mark, 2004/11/10
  • Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, David, 2004/11/11

SPF web site, Koen Martens, 2004/11/09

• Re: SPF web site, James, 2004/11/09
• Re: SPF web site, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/09
• Re: SPF web site, Shane Rush, 2004/11/09

Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, James, 2004/11/09

• Re: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, James, 2004/11/09
• Re: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/09
• Re: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, Holm, Mark, 2004/11/09
  • Re: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, James, 2004/11/09
  • Re: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, Shane Rush, 2004/11/09
    • Re: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, James, 2004/11/09
    • Re: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, Shane Rush, 2004/11/10
    • Re: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/10
    • Re: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, James, 2004/11/10
• RE: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, James Couzens, 2004/11/09
  • Re: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, Larry Smith, 2004/11/09
    • Re: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, James Couzens, 2004/11/09
    • Re: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, Larry Smith, 2004/11/09
    • RE: A Response to the Microsoft Letter ..., John Glube, 2004/11/09
    • RE: A Response to the Microsoft Letter ..., Guy, 2004/11/09
    • RE: A Response to the Microsoft Letter ..., James, 2004/11/09
    • Re: A Response to the Microsoft Letter ..., Shane Rush, 2004/11/09

OT: Encrypting Proxy question: What "MAIL FROM:" address is safe to use?, Chris Drake, 2004/11/09

• RE: OT: Encrypting Proxy question: What "MAIL FROM:" address is safe to use?, Richard Bang, 2004/11/09
  • Re[2]: OT: Encrypting Proxy question: What "MAIL FROM:" address is safe to use?, Chris Drake, 2004/11/09
• OT: Encrypting Proxy question: What "MAIL FROM:" address is safe to use?, Roger Moser, 2004/11/09
• RE: OT: Encrypting Proxy question: What "MAIL FROM:" address is safe to use?, Mark, 2004/11/09

Typo on spf.pobox.com site, James Couzens, 2004/11/08

• Typo on spf.pobox.com site, Roger Moser, 2004/11/09
  • Re: Typo on spf.pobox.com site, wayne, 2004/11/09

An eweek article on MS and IP rights...., Boyd Lynn Gerber, 2004/11/08

• Re: An eweek article on MS and IP rights...., Jonathan Gardner, 2004/11/08

refocusing on SRS, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/07

• Re: refocusing on SRS, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/07
• RE: refocusing on SRS, Mark, 2004/11/08
• NOT refocusing on SRS, James Couzens, 2004/11/08
  • RULE ANNOUNCE: NO MORE JAMES VS. SHEVEK POSTS, Greg Connor, 2004/11/09
    • Re: RULE ANNOUNCE: NO MORE JAMES VS. SHEVEK POSTS, James Couzens, 2004/11/09
  • Re: NOT refocusing on SRS, Koen Martens, 2004/11/09
    • Re: NOT refocusing on SRS, James, 2004/11/09

Slides & stepping back, Koen Martens, 2004/11/07

• Re: Slides & stepping back, Michael Weiner, 2004/11/07
• Re: Slides & stepping back, James Couzens, 2004/11/07
  • Re: Slides & stepping back, Koen Martens, 2004/11/07
• Re: Slides & stepping back, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/07
  • Re: Re: Slides & stepping back, Koen Martens, 2004/11/07
    • Re: Slides & stepping back, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/07
    • Re: Re: Slides & stepping back, jpinkerton, 2004/11/07
• Re: Slides & stepping back, wayne, 2004/11/07

Meeting in person next week, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/05

• Re: Meeting in person next week, James Couzens, 2004/11/05
• Re: Meeting in person next week, Michael Hammer, 2004/11/08
  • RE: Meeting in person next week, Dennis Dayman, 2004/11/08
    • Meng's website, jpinkerton, 2004/11/08
    • Re: Meng's website, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/08
    • Re: Meng's website, frank, 2004/11/08
    • Re: Meng's website, Hannah Schroeter, 2004/11/10
    • Re: Meng's website, James Couzens, 2004/11/08
    • Attend the FTC Email Authentication Summit by phone, Guy, 2004/11/08
    • Pledge, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/08
    • Re: Meng's website, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/09
    • Re: Meng's website, James Couzens, 2004/11/08
    • Re: Meng's website, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/09
    • Re: Re: Meng's website, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/09
    • Re: Re: Meng's website, James Couzens, 2004/11/09
    • OT: PRA (was: Meeting in person next week), Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/08
• Re: Meeting in person next week, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/08

Summary of SPF Organization Poll, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/05

• Re: Summary of SPF Organization Poll, Nick Phillips, 2004/11/05
• Action based on SPF Organization Poll, jpinkerton, 2004/11/08
  • Re: Action based on SPF Organization Poll, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/11/08
    • Re: Action based on SPF Organization Poll, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/08
    • Re: Action based on SPF Organization Poll, Koen Martens, 2004/11/08
    • Re: Action based on SPF Organization Poll, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/11/09
    • Re: Action based on SPF Organization Poll, wayne, 2004/11/08
    • Re: Action based on SPF Organization Poll, jpinkerton, 2004/11/09
    • Re: Action based on SPF Organization Poll, Shane Rush, 2004/11/09
    • Re: Action based on SPF Organization Poll, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/11/09
    • Re: Action based on SPF Organization Poll, jpinkerton, 2004/11/09
  • Re: Action based on SPF Organization Poll, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/08
  • Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 2004/11/09
    • Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", James, 2004/11/09
    • RE: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council", John Glube, 2004/11/09
    • Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 2004/11/10
    • Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 2004/11/10
    • Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council", James Couzens, 2004/11/10
    • Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council", George Schlossnagle, 2004/11/10
    • Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council", James Couzens, 2004/11/11
    • Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sitonthe "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 2004/11/10
    • RE: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council", Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/10
    • Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council", wayne, 2004/11/10
    • CLEAR (was: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council"), Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/10
    • Re: CLEAR (was: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council"), william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/10
    • Re: CLEAR, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/10
    • Re: Re: CLEAR, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/11
    • Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Shane Rush, 2004/11/09
    • RE: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", terry, 2004/11/09
    • Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/09
    • Re: Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", James Couzens, 2004/11/09
    • RE: Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", terry, 2004/11/09
    • Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 2004/11/09
    • RE: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Mark, 2004/11/09
    • Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", wayne, 2004/11/09
    • Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", csm, 2004/11/10
    • Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Michael Weiner, 2004/11/10
    • Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", csm, 2004/11/10
    • Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Michael Weiner, 2004/11/10
    • Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", csm, 2004/11/10
    • Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", wayne, 2004/11/11
    • Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/11
    • Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Rene Barbier, 2004/11/09
    • Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Paul Ficinski, 2004/11/10
    • List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 2004/11/11
    • Yahoo Domain Keys - Standard?, Bruce Barnes, 2004/11/11
    • Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Greg Connor, 2004/11/12
    • RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/12
    • Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Mark C. Langston, 2004/11/13
    • Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Greg Connor, 2004/11/12
    • RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/12
    • RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Mark Shewmaker, 2004/11/13
    • List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 2004/11/12
    • RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Mark, 2004/11/12
    • Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leade, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/11/12
    • Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF L, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/11/12
    • Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF L, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/11/12
    • Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF L, csm, 2004/11/12
    • RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", terry, 2004/11/12
    • List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 2004/11/13
    • Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/13
    • Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Marc Kool, 2004/11/14
    • RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Guy, 2004/11/14
    • RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/15
    • RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPFLeadership Council", terry, 2004/11/15
    • RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", James Couzens, 2004/11/15
    • RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Julian Mehnle, 2004/11/14
    • Campaign: If elected I will, terry, 2004/11/14
    • Campaign: If elected I will ...., wayne, 2004/11/15
    • RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Seth Goodman, 2004/11/14
    • Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Chuck Mead, 2004/11/14
    • RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", David Woodhouse, 2004/11/24
    • Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/11/14
    • RE: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Julian Mehnle, 2004/11/13

RE: Re: [OT] HTML rant, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/05

• Re: Re: [OT] HTML rant, jpinkerton, 2004/11/05
• RE: Re: [OT] HTML rant, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/05

web page on sender ID, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/04

• Re: web page on sender ID, Koen Martens, 2004/11/05
  • Re: web page on sender ID, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/05
• Re: web page on sender ID, wayne, 2004/11/05
  • Re: web page on sender ID, Alan Hodgson, 2004/11/05
  • Re: web page on sender ID, Koen Martens, 2004/11/05
    • Re: web page on sender ID, Michael Weiner, 2004/11/05
    • Re: web page on sender ID, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/05
  • Re: web page on sender ID, Roger Moser, 2004/11/06
• Re: web page on sender ID, Hector Santos, 2004/11/05
• web page on sender ID, James Couzens, 2004/11/05
  • Re: web page on sender ID, James Couzens, 2004/11/05
    • Re: web page on sender ID, Koen Martens, 2004/11/05
    • Re: web page on sender ID, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/05
    • Re: web page on sender ID, wayne, 2004/11/05
    • Re: web page on sender ID, James Couzens, 2004/11/05
    • Re: web page on sender ID, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/06
    • Re: web page on sender ID, wayne, 2004/11/06
    • Re: web page on sender ID, Koen Martens, 2004/11/06
    • Re: web page on sender ID, James Couzens, 2004/11/07
• Re: web page on sender ID, Holm, Mark, 2004/11/05
  • Re: Re: web page on sender ID, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/05
    • Re: Re: web page on sender ID, Nick Phillips, 2004/11/05
  • Re: web page on sender ID, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/05
  • Re: Re: web page on sender ID, James Couzens, 2004/11/05
    • Re: Re: web page on sender ID, Roger Moser, 2004/11/06
• Re: web page on sender ID, Holm, Mark, 2004/11/05
  • Re: Re: web page on sender ID, James Couzens, 2004/11/05
• Re: web page on sender ID, mholm, 2004/11/07
  • Re: web page on sender ID, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/07
• Re: web page on sender ID, mholm, 2004/11/08
  • Re: web page on sender ID, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/08

A Cautionary Tale concerning AOL, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/11/04

• RE: A Cautionary Tale concerning AOL, Brian Barrios, 2004/11/05
  • RE: A Cautionary Tale concerning AOL, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/11/05
  • Re: A Cautionary Tale concerning AOL, wayne, 2004/11/05
    • RE: A Cautionary Tale concerning AOL, Richard Bang, 2004/11/05
    • RE: A Cautionary Tale concerning AOL, Brian Barrios, 2004/11/05
• RE: A Cautionary Tale concerning AOL, Raymond Neeves, 2004/11/04
• RE: A Cautionary Tale concerning AOL, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/05

new SES draft available for comment, Seth Goodman, 2004/11/04

• Re: new SES draft available for comment, Michael Weiner, 2004/11/04
  • RE: new SES draft available for comment, Seth Goodman, 2004/11/04

RE: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b., Stefan Engelbert, 2004/11/04

• Re: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b., Peter Bowyer, 2004/11/04

RE: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Stefan Engelbert, 2004/11/04

• Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b., Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/11/04
• RE: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Stefan Engelbert, 2004/11/04
  • Re: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Peter Bowyer, 2004/11/04
    • Re: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., M Z R, 2004/11/04
    • Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/04
    • Re: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., M Z R, 2004/11/04
    • Re: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., jdoupe+spf, 2004/11/04
    • RE: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Brian Barrios, 2004/11/04
    • Re: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., jdoupe+spf, 2004/11/04
    • Re: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., wayne, 2004/11/04
    • RE: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Brian Barrios, 2004/11/04
    • Re: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., wayne, 2004/11/04
    • RE: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Brian Barrios, 2004/11/04
    • RE: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Brian Barrios, 2004/11/04
    • Re: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Koen Martens, 2004/11/04
    • RE: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Roger Moser, 2004/11/04
    • RE: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/04
    • Re: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., wayne, 2004/11/04
    • RE: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Roger Moser, 2004/11/04
    • Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/05
    • Re: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., M Z R, 2004/11/04
    • RE: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Brian Barrios, 2004/11/04
    • Re: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., wayne, 2004/11/04
    • RE: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Brian Barrios, 2004/11/04

v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail.com ~all, mholm, 2004/11/03

• Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail.com ~all, Michael Weiner, 2004/11/03
• Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail.com ~all, wayne, 2004/11/03
• Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/11/04
  • Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/04
• Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail.com ~all, mholm, 2004/11/03
• Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail.com ~all, mholm, 2004/11/03
  • Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail.com ~all, Michael Weiner, 2004/11/03

[OT] HTML rant (was: Moved to SES-DEVEL list), Jon Bertrand, 2004/11/03

• Re: [OT] HTML rant, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/05
  • RE: Re: [OT] HTML rant, Guy, 2004/11/05
    • Re: Re: [OT] HTML rant, jpinkerton, 2004/11/05
    • Re: [OT] HTML rant, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/05

RE: Re: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Su mmit, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/03

• Re: Re: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Su mmit, wayne, 2004/11/03
• RE: Re: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Su mmit, Seth Goodman, 2004/11/03

RE: Re: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Su mmit, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/03

• RE: Re: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Su mmit, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/03
  • Re: Re: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Su mmit, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/04

Re: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Summit, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/11/03

• Re: Re: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Summit, wayne, 2004/11/03

draft-schlitt-spf-00pre4 now available, wayne, 2004/11/03

• Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre4 now available, James Couzens, 2004/11/03
  • Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre4 now available, wayne, 2004/11/03
    • Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre4 now available, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/05
  • Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre4 now available, Hector Santos, 2004/11/05
    • Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre4 now available, wayne, 2004/11/05
  • Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre4 now available, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/05
• Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre4 now available, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/11/03
• Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre4 now available, Mark, 2004/11/03
• RE: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre4 now available, MW Mike Weiner (5028), 2004/11/03
  • Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre4 now available, wayne, 2004/11/03
    • Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre4 now available, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/05

accredit= submodifier, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/02

• Re: accredit= submodifier, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/02
• RE: accredit= submodifier, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/03
  • Re: accredit= submodifier, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/03
• RE: accredit= submodifier, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/11/03
  • Re: accredit= submodifier, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/03
    • Re: Re: accredit= submodifier, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/04
    • Re: accredit= submodifier, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/04

Has SRS been published as Internet Draft, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/02

• Re: Has SRS been published as Internet Draft, wayne, 2004/11/02
  • Re: Has SRS been published as Internet Draft, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/04

Redirected Trace header draft (was Processed-By or Transmitted-By header concept), william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/02

• Re: Redirected Trace header draft, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/02
  • Re: Re: Redirected Trace header draft, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/03
    • Re: Redirected Trace header draft, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/06
    • Re: Re: Redirected Trace header draft, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/07
    • Re: Redirected Trace header draft, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/07
    • Re: Re: Redirected Trace header draft, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/11/08
    • Re: Re: Re: Redirected Trace header draft, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/08

SPF-DISCUSS Mail Summary Report, winserver . support, 2004/11/02

• SPF-DISCUSS Mail Summary Report, winserver . support, 2004/11/09
• SPF-DISCUSS Mail Summary Report, winserver . support, 2004/11/16
• SPF-DISCUSS Mail Summary Report, winserver . support, 2004/11/23
• SPF-DISCUSS Mail Summary Report, winserver . support, 2004/11/30

SPF for Dummies..., Andrew W . Donoho, 2004/11/02

• Re: SPF for Dummies..., jpinkerton, 2004/11/02
• Re: SPF for Dummies..., Commerco WebMaster, 2004/11/02

SPF Organization Poll - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community (fwd), william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/02

• Re: SPF Organization Poll - Questions to ALL particpants on the list onfuture of SPF Community (fwd), Peter Bowyer, 2004/11/02
• Re: SPF Organization Poll - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community (fwd), william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/04
  • comments on - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community (fwd), jpinkerton, 2004/11/04

DomainKeys vs IIM, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/01

• Re: DomainKeys vs IIM, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/01
  • Re: DomainKeys vs IIM, wayne, 2004/11/01
    • Re: DomainKeys vs IIM, william(at)elan.net, 2004/11/02

Re: Using "v=spf1/scope1,scope2,scope3 " as a scoping syntax, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/11/01

• RE: Using "v=spf1/scope1,scope2,scope3 " as ascoping syntax, Richard Bang, 2004/11/01
  • RE: Using "v=spf1/scope1,scope2,scope3 " as ascoping syntax, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/11/01
    • RE: Using "v=spf1/scope1,scope2,scope3 " as ascopingsyntax, Richard Bang, 2004/11/01
    • RE: Using "v=spf1/scope1,scope2,scope3 " as ascopingsyntax, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/11/01
    • Re: Using "v=spf1/scope1,scope2,scope3 " as ascoping syntax, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/01
    • Re: Re: Using "v=spf1/scope1,scope2,scope3 " as ascoping syntax, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/11/01
    • Re: Using "v=spf1/scope1,scope2,scope3 " as ascoping syntax, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/01
    • Please Pause [was Using "v=spf1/scope1,scope2,scope3 " as ascoping syntax], Hector Santos, 2004/11/02

Re: Moved to SES-DEVEL list, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/01

• Re: Re: Moved to SES-DEVEL list, James Couzens, 2004/11/02
  • [OT] HTML rant (was: Moved to SES-DEVEL list), Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/02
    • Re: [OT] HTML rant (was: Moved to SES-DEVEL list), James Couzens, 2004/11/02
    • Re: [OT] HTML rant (was: Moved to SES-DEVEL list), jpinkerton, 2004/11/03
    • RE: [OT] HTML rant (was: Moved to SES-DEVEL list), terry, 2004/11/03
    • Re: [OT] HTML rant (was: Moved to SES-DEVEL list), Hannah Schroeter, 2004/11/10
    • Re: [OT] HTML rant (was: Moved to SES-DEVEL list), jpinkerton, 2004/11/03
    • Re: [OT] HTML rant (was: Moved to SES-DEVEL list), Koen Martens, 2004/11/04
    • Re: [OT] HTML rant, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/05
    • Re: Re: [OT] HTML rant, jpinkerton, 2004/11/05
    • Re: [OT] HTML rant, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/05

Re: purely dual-format approach, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/01

• Re: purely dual-format approach, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/01
• RE: purely dual-format approach, Richard Bang, 2004/11/01
  • Re: purely dual-format approach, Koen Martens, 2004/11/01
• Re: purely dual-format approach, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/01
• Re: purely dual-format approach, wayne, 2004/11/01
• RE: purely dual-format approach, Richard Bang, 2004/11/01
• purely dual-format approach, Roger Moser, 2004/11/01
  • RE: purely dual-format approach, terry, 2004/11/01
    • Re: purely dual-format approach, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/11/01
    • Re: purely dual-format approach, wayne, 2004/11/01
    • Re: purely dual-format approach, Hannah Schroeter, 2004/11/02
  • Re: purely dual-format approach, Jeff Macdonald, 2004/11/02
    • Re: purely dual-format approach, Hannah Schroeter, 2004/11/02
    • Re: purely dual-format approach, Frank Ellermann, 2004/11/02
• Re: purely dual-format approach, Jeff Macdonald, 2004/11/02

Re: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Graham Murray, 2004/11/01

• Re: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/11/01
• RE: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Scott Kitterman, 2004/11/01
  • RE: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Greg Connor, 2004/11/01
    • RE: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/11/02
• Re: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Andrew W . Donoho, 2004/11/01
  • Re: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>, 2004/11/01
    • Re: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>, 2004/11/01