spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID

2004-11-26 01:54:00
On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 23:41 +0100, Julian Mehnle wrote:

Pardon me, I have also been rejecting mail based on SPF "fail" results for
about half a year now, and I have not encountered any false positives I
could not tolerate.  In fact, I have had almost no false positives at all.

How many users do you have?  Do they get angry when they don't get mail?
All the wrong people are giving all the wrong advice.  What I find
troubling most are that the people giving advice in here for the most
part have absolutely no experience from a decently sized ISP's
perspective, or anyone with customers.  I'm not pointing the finger
directly at you, since I do not know the scope of your employment nor
your network, but I would like to hear.

Cheers,

James

-- 
James Couzens,
Programmer
                                                     ( ( (      
      ((__))         __\|/__        __|-|__        '. ___ .'    
       (00)           (o o)          (0~0)        '  (> <) '    
---nn-(o__o)-nn---ooO--(_)--Ooo--ooO--(_)--Ooo---ooO--(_)--Ooo---
http://libspf.org -- ANSI C Sender Policy Framework library
http://libsrs.org -- ANSI C Sender Rewriting Scheme library
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7A7C7DCF

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in Atlanta features 
SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part