-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of Roger
Moser
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 1:36 AM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: RE: [spf-discuss] URGENT: Community Position on SenderID
Julian Mehnle wrote:
Pardon me, I have also been rejecting mail based on SPF
"fail" results for
about half a year now, and I have not encountered any false
positives I
could not tolerate. In fact, I have had almost no false
positives at all.
On my server about 0.04% of the incoming legitimate mails fail SPF.
And so: What about that 0.04%? Is it because of bad/incomplete SPF records?
Or is it forwarding
that was not dealt with via SES (or SRS)?
Can you give those details?
Thanks
Terry Fielder
Manager Software Development and Deployment
Great Gulf Homes / Ashton Woods Homes
terry(_at_)greatgulfhomes(_dot_)com
Fax: (416) 441-9085
Roger
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in
Atlanta features SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily
deactivate your subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com