spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Typo on spf.pobox.com site

2004-11-09 11:07:21
In <4889(_at_)rama(_dot_)pamho(_dot_)net> "Roger Moser" 
<Roger(_dot_)Moser(_at_)rama(_dot_)pamho(_dot_)net> writes:

I found another mistake:

  spf2.0 records
  I just published my SPF record. Do I need to publish an spf2.0 record?

  Answer: probably not.

The answer is incorrect. The correct answer is:

Yes, all domains that publish an spf1 record MUST also publish an empty
spf2.0/pra record until all mailing lists are adding the PRA. This is
required because by default, Sender ID will read v=spf1 records for checks
against both identities.


/me agrees, but doesn't expect the mistake to be fixed.  :-/


-wayne


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>