RE: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
> [mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of Tony 
> Finch
> Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 5:19 PM
> To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
> Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding
>
>
> On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Chuck Mead wrote:
> > But if SPF is doing what I want why does that mean it's broken?
> So you'd like me to reject email from you if you send it to my
> @FreeBSD.org or @apache.org addresses? Because they both forward
> to my main email system and your policy is that forwarding is not
> allowed.
If the original sender signed the message with SES, problem solved.

If the original sender did not sign the message with SES, then the intermediate 
forwarder should use
SRS.

Is there a problem (other then getting the forwarding server to run SRS)?

Terry Fielder
Manager Software Development and Deployment
Great Gulf Homes / Ashton Woods Homes
terry(_at_)greatgulfhomes(_dot_)com
Fax: (416) 441-9085

> Tony.
> --
> f.a.n.finch  <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at>  http://dotat.at/
> MALIN HEBRIDES: NORTHEAST 4 OR 5 INCREASING 6. RAIN LATER.
> GOOD BECOMING
> MODERATE.
>
> -------
> Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
> Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
> http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in
> Atlanta features SPF and Sender ID.
> To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily
> deactivate your subscription,
> please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com