Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding

spf-discuss

2004-11-21 12:30:00

William wrote:

I think we should do it in a way that SRS rewriting keeps SES signature
clearly visible and the other way around


I don't agree. SRS should never touch a signed envelop sender.

Roger

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, (continued) Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Frank Ellermann Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Jeff Macdonald Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Tony Finch Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Chuck Mead RE: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, terry Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Frank Ellermann RE: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, terry RE: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, william(at)elan.net Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Roger Moser <= Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Frank Ellermann

Previous by Date:	RE: draft-schlitt-spf-01 now available, Stephen Pollei
Next by Date:	Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Roger Moser
Previous by Thread:	Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, william(at)elan.net
Next by Thread:	Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Frank Ellermann
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]