Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding
2004-11-21 15:18:36
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Chuck Mead wrote:
But if SPF is doing what I want why does that mean it's broken?
So you'd like me to reject email from you if you send it to my
@FreeBSD.org or @apache.org addresses? Because they both forward
to my main email system and your policy is that forwarding is not
allowed.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at> http://dotat.at/
MALIN HEBRIDES: NORTHEAST 4 OR 5 INCREASING 6. RAIN LATER. GOOD BECOMING
MODERATE.
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, (continued)
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Chuck Mead
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Chuck Mead
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Chuck Mead
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse
- RE: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Bruce Barnes
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Jeff Macdonald
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding,
Tony Finch <=
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Chuck Mead
- RE: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, terry
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Frank Ellermann
RE: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, terry
Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, william(at)elan.net
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Chuck Mead |
Next by Date: |
Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Chuck Mead |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse |
Next by Thread: |
Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Chuck Mead |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|