Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding
2004-11-21 13:12:38
Chuck Mead wrote:
Unless the domain owner is exercising his or her right the use of the
domain in this way. In which case SPF is not broken at all... it's doing
exactly what the domain owner intends.
Augh!
I cannot type today...
Unless the domain owner is exercising his or her right "to restrict"
etc.
--
csm(_at_)moongroup(_dot_)com, head geek
http://moongroup.com
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Meng Weng Wong
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Roger Moser
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Chuck Mead
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding,
Chuck Mead <=
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Chuck Mead
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Chuck Mead
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse
- RE: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Bruce Barnes
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Jeff Macdonald
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Tony Finch
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Chuck Mead |
Next by Date: |
Re: Sendmail white paper, Nico Kadel-Garcia |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Chuck Mead |
Next by Thread: |
Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|