On Sun, 2004-11-21 at 12:03 -0500, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 08:47:00PM +0100, Roger Moser wrote:
|
| SRS breaks SES. The mail will be rejected if the mail is forwarded by a
| second forwarder (not doing SRS) after being forwarded by a forwarder that
| applied SRS.
I don't understand why this mail would be rejected. Unless it's just
rejected due to the normal brokenness of SPF when mail is forwarded?
i think we can rejigger SRS to not rewrite if SES is seen.
It would be better to have SRS happen _only_ if the original source
address has IP-dependent mechanisms followed by '-all', and preferably
also only if the recipient is known to check SPF.
--
dwmw2