Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding

On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 12:51 -0600, wayne wrote:
> SRS and SES solve two different problems.  If you forward email, you
> need to do SRS (or equiv).  If you send email that may be forwarded,
> it may be a good idea to do SES.
Yes, i am aware of the distinction and appreciate your pointing that
out  :-)

Michael

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in Atlanta features 
SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part