Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding
2004-11-24 12:37:43
Meng Weng Wong wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 11:17:54AM -0500, Michael Weiner wrote:
|
| Agreed, i have already switched to -all sometime ago. Any statistics on
| ~all vs -all, just curious who is publishing with the -all.
|
As a sender with -all, have you seen any bounces due to
forwarding?
All 100+ domains I manage are using -all, which works fine as none of
those domains are (knowingly) subject to forwarding. We have not had any
negative issues due to our SPF deployment configuration. I only wish
more recipients would check our SPF records! The amount of back-scatter
I get from bounces due to forged From: headers is quite annoying...
Doug
--*--
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm
not sure about the former.
-Albert Einstein
--*--
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [STOP THREAD] Sendmail white paper (which is really about forwarding and -all), (continued)
- Re: [STOP THREAD] Sendmail white paper (which is really about forwarding and -all), James Couzens
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Michael Weiner
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Meng Weng Wong
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Michael Weiner
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, wayne
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Michael Weiner
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Theo Schlossnagle
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Michael Weiner
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Roger Moser
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding,
Douglas K. Fischer <=
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Roger Moser
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Michael Weiner
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Michael Weiner
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Chuck Mead
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Michael Weiner
- Re: Sendmail white paper, M Z R
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Nico Kadel-Garcia
- Re: Sendmail white paper, M Z R
- RE: Sendmail white paper, terry
|
|
|