On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 07:25 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
So there are technically alert, fairly large sites
that rely on forwarding or forwarding like behavior without being willing or
yet finding the resources to implement SRS...
Your sentence makes sense so far.
...or SES.
But this doesn't. The forwarding sites don't need to implement SES and
it wouldn't help _your_ mail get through if they did.
_You_ can implement SES to avoid any need for forwarding sites to do
_anything_. You remain compatible with current practice, and it doesn't
need to change. Which is probably just as well since the vast majority
of forwarding sites aren't _going_ to do anything, I suspect.
We can live with them, and work around them, but I really don't think we can
simply ignore them.
Agreed.
--
dwmw2