The spf record for "amazon.com" does cover that IP address.
I guess they are slow to adjust all other spf records.
Or maybe someone at amazon does not understand that each host/domain must
have a spf record.
Guy
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com] On Behalf Of Stuart
D. Gathman
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 9:07 AM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Cc: jonagard(_at_)amazon(_dot_)com
Subject: RE: [spf-discuss] Softfail problem at Amazon
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Guy wrote:
The IP address 207.171.180.182 is not listed. So "~all" takes effect. "~"
is softfail.
Yes, that is not the mistake. The mistake is that it probably *should*
be listed. The messages come from an Amazon server (according to the
PTR record), and I looked at the content of a few - they seem to be
legitimate
order notifications.
--
Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flamis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in Atlanta features
SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com