Re: SPF too late?

On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 11:35:57AM +1100, Chris Drake wrote:
| BrightMail claims false-positive rates of 1 in a billion. I've been
| using it for 3 days, and it's been spot-on so far (I get a *lot* of
| junk and a lot of legitimate mail).  There's no need for SPF or
| SenderID or anything else if it can keep this up.

Sounds great, can you send me a copy of the source so I can
install it?

thanks