spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF

2004-11-11 21:19:12
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, B. Johannessen spewed into the bitstream:

BJ>James Couzens wrote:
BJ>> On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 13:24 -0500, csm(_at_)redhat(_dot_)com wrote:
BJ>> > I don't want to come across as overly critical or even negative here but
BJ>> > I really have to say this... as we look at possible architectures can we
BJ>> > please, PLEASE not turn the phone book into a lead weight... it's 
BJ>> 
BJ>> I'd like to nominate this chap for the new SPF council.  He's absolutely
BJ>> brilliant.  Someone please second this nomination.
BJ>
BJ>I'll second that emotion :-)

/me blushes again... and thank you both very much.

As wayne says later in this thread he has nominated me and I indicated 
already my willingness to serve... perhaps a second is called for?

/me smiles...

- -- 
Chuck Mead <csm(_at_)redhat(_dot_)com>
Instructor II (and resident Postfix bigot), GLS
Disclaimer: "It's Thursday and my name is Locutus of B0rk!"
Addendum: "Bwahahaha! Fire up the orbital mind-control lasers!"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBlDnEZfy0juH51WsRAvS4AJ4winbtxpZbeoyTDICWM9ZWchle3QCeL7cU
trUSwZLfpuEaxHg5RKUqsDY=
=DUrM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----