Despite the fact that i think this poll is quite disruptive, i feel the
need to answer it to assert my opinion:
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 01:28:34PM -0500,
spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com wrote:
Content-Description: Digest 1.630 for spf-discuss
Questions:
1. Do you believe that SPF Organization (and SPF council) need to have
defined rules of order to function properly and be able to represent
SPF Community?
Answers: YES/NO
YES
If answered YES, how do you think the rules should be approved:
a. Separate full work on the SPF-discuss mail list
b. Vote only by SPF elected council
Sorry, i don't understand the answers. What is 'seperate full work'? My
opinion: rules need to be set up by the elected council, and agreed upon
by the rest of the community.
2. Do you want to see elections immediately for SPF council (answer
no matter how you answered 1)?
Answers: YES/NO
YES
If answered YES, what do you believe this new council should do
(answer each question separately):
2a. Work on SPF charter and rules of conduct. YES/NO
2b. Supervise SPF community activities as seen in part 3 of my
original SPF Organization Questionnaire? YES/NO
a & b: YES
3. If elections for the council are carried out without any formally
approved rules, how long should the council function?
Answers:
a. Until the new SPF charter and rules are approved by the community
b. For 6 months no matter what
c. For 1 year no matter what
d. For 2 years no matter what
e. The elections should not be carried out at all if there
are no approved rules on how long SPF council will serve.
b or c
4. What should be the rules for initial election for the council?
Answers:
a. Anybody at all (no restrictions for those on spf-discuss
no matter if they posted before or not).
b. Anybody who have participated in SPF Community (based
on at least one post on spf-discuss mail list)
c. Only those who have participated in SPF Community recently
based on last 1 month of posts
d. Only those who have participated in SPF Community recently
based on last 2 month of posts
e. Those who have participated more actively in SPF (at least
2 posts every month for 3 of last 6 months)
Whatever John P decides (after consulting with the irc channel and
without any strong opposition from the list)
5. Who would you like to see conducting elections for SPF Community?
(Give the name of one of the active SPF participants who you like
to see do it. The person with more votes then others will be asked
to do it. If he/she declines, then next person on the list, etc)
John Pinkerton has been organising this election, so it seems no more
than logical that he carries out the election. I have a 100% trust in
him an that he will carry this out honestly.
Koen
--
K.F.J. Martens, Sonologic, http://www.sonologic.nl/
Networking, embedded systems, unix expertise, artificial intelligence.
Public PGP key: http://www.metro.cx/pubkey-gmc.asc
Wondering about the funny attachment your mail program
can't read? Visit http://www.openpgp.org/