In
<Pine(_dot_)LNX(_dot_)4(_dot_)44(_dot_)0411201100480(_dot_)13761-100000(_at_)sokol(_dot_)elan(_dot_)net>
"william(at)elan.net" <william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net> writes:
The beautiful part about SRS is that it is completely local. The inner
details of my implementation do not need to be known to you for us to
interoperate.
That "beautiful part" is exactly why Sendmail thinks it will interfere
with mail signatures authorization and I agree.
How can SRS interfere with mail signature authorization?
Ok, it can interfere with SES, but sendmail doesn't even mention SES,
so that can't be their point. As Meng said, even in the case of SES,
SRS will still give you an SPF pass.
I would apreciate it if either you or sendmail could please explain.
-wayne