spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Sendmail white paper

2004-11-20 09:21:52
Meng Weng Wong wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 10:53:35AM -0500, Chuck Mead wrote:
| | They recommend ~all instead of -all. |
Recommending ~all was the consensus at the Inbox event,
where everybody said that forwarding was too big a problem
to be ignored, and cautious senders shouldn't go -all
because of the FPs.

Great... let's just not implement it then. Let's hang on to the stinking, rotting corpse of the "kinder gentler" internet and leave the new one in the hands of the spammers, the 419 scammers, the viruses and the worms.

In recent weeks I have concluded that we're (meaning, essentially those who understand how email works) never going to allowed to fix this problem. Why? Because the lusers and the pin head govt officials and the pointy headed MBA dweebs with just enough clue to "get" what a mailing list is used for do *NOT* have the WILL (intestinal fortitude) to see that their precious internet is dead.

Forwarding sucks!

--
csm(_at_)moongroup(_dot_)com, head geek
http://moongroup.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>