spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF

2004-11-18 16:58:50
Mark wrote:

Technically, it is not even necessary to 'expose' the
envelope-from to the recipient at all.

RfC 3834 strongly disagrees with this.  The MAIL FROM aka
Return-Path is the alpha and omega of SMTP.  RfC 3834 asks
all Auto-Responders to ignore mails without Return-Path.

RfC 3834 IMHO also forbids "Sender ID", but that's another
discussion, we all know that PRA is broken beyond repair. 

But I agree with you that a technical problem between my
box and anybody else should be reported to me and not to
Dave - if he sent the mail in question from my box... ;-)

It could be as simple as "RoadRuner spams you with bogus
virus alerts, but doesn't accept abuse reports from your
MTA".  Or a "SORBS 127.0.0.6: pay 50 dollars or get lost"

Oh yes, it happened both.  And it was obviously a problem
between _my_ box and the receiver.  I got the bounce, and
I reported it in nanas / nanae / the works.  It was not a
problem between Dave's mail.songbird.com and the receiver.

                       Bye, Frank



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>