spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SP F

2004-11-12 08:33:14
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Hallam-Baker, Phillip spewed into the bitstream:

HP>> And how it is set up in the first place - no smoke-free back rooms ;-)
HP>
HP>Why else do you think that I am trying to get the term acountable into the
HP>title of the group?
HP>
HP>Nobody on this list is going to be invited into the back rooms where all the
HP>decision power lies at the IETF. You can see that some folk think they are
HP>in the running but they are in for a surprise.
HP>
HP>Setting up the SPF Leadership council is already a challenge to the IETF
HP>establishment, one that they are likely to find easy to rebuff by simply
HP>asserting that they invented the Internet (which is untrue, the real
HP>visionaries left long ago). 
HP>
HP>If you choose standards expertise as the issue then the establishment will
HP>win, unfairly in my view but the image they have constructed is one of being
HP>the experts in this area. If on the other hand you choose accountability
HP>then the fact that the IETF constitution is a stalinist farce becomes
HP>apparent, lots of happy talk about inclusiveness and openess and all the
HP>decision making power reserved to an unelected, unaccountable politburo.

An excellent strategic direction I think. I know we've had our 
differences but your comments have genuine merit. I am hoping that 
others agree with this as well. Accountability *IS* the bedrock issue 
and unless we go there I must agree that we will lose.

- --
csm(_at_)moongroup(_dot_)com, head geek
http://moongroup.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBlNe+v6Gjsf2pQ0oRAjRDAJ4i0uB6B6I1c88OAJVYw1dWnDGtqQCfcsks
zYI3G8kVkvc9taJSWNgdFSo=
=gEMU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----