Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF

Roger Moser wrote:

But I think saying "spf1 records are for MAIL FROM and HELO
only" is much better.


Yes, I or rather my ISP won't add a dummy "exists:%{l}.invalid"
to opt-out of PRA abuse.  Same idea was with TXT "spf2.0/pra"
and all other opt-out schemes offered by spammers.  Bye, Frank

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, (continued) RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, william(at)elan.net Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, jpinkerton RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, terry RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Roger Moser RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Roger Moser Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann <= RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, administrator RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Guy RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Greg Connor Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Guy