-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com] On Behalf Of Tony
Finch
Sent: vrijdag 26 november 2004 14:57
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: RE: [spf-discuss] Ignoring rejected mail?
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004, Mark wrote:
And SRS. :)
SRS is not designed for this purpose and has a lot of
brain damage that is best avoided.
Not to start a whole new round of SRS vs. SES, but SRS is ideally suited
for the job.
SRS is based on the 'what-goes-around-comes-around' principle; or, rather,
'what does not go around should not come around'. I have been using SRS
for a good year now, and primarily for the purpose of detecting fake
DSNs.
YMMV,
- Mark
System Administrator Asarian-host.org
---
"If you were supposed to understand it,
we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx