In <14498597(_dot_)1099259087(_at_)[192(_dot_)168(_dot_)0(_dot_)2]> Greg Connor
<gconnor(_at_)nekodojo(_dot_)org> writes:
I am frankly sick of hearing about "Microsoft Bad!" and how we should
turn all of SPF's resources into an Anti-MS machine by actively
opposing them. Most of the No Reuse arguments seem to be based on
this.
I am frankly sick of hearing about how any objections to the PRA is
somehow anti-MS. Most of your strawman arguments against No Reuse are
based on this.
Yes, 2b. exists and I'm sick of that one too. Vocal people on the No
Reuse side just automatically believe that 2a. has been conclusively
shown, so they just repeat the mantra, "PRA is flawed. Mail will
bounce. People will blame SPF."
Funny, very few people have stepped forward and said they *like* the
PRA. Either here or on the MARID list. When they do step forward and
you ask about the technical flaws, they don't reply.
The best that I can tell, the PRA *is* flawed. Mail *will* bounce. I
think it is at least plausable that people will blame SPF.
You say it is a mantra, I say it is the outline of a logical
argument.
It's natural to want to believe
things that support your side, but it's silly to repeat them if you
haven't checked.
I hate to say it, but you seem to be suffering a lot from problem of
wanting to believe things that support your side.
-wayne