On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 16:48 +0100, Frank Ellermann wrote:
James Couzens wrote:
my "no nonsense", "say what I feel" abrasive personality is
not well suited to working with others who have strongly
different ideas as to how to do things.
A "no nonsense" standard is exactly what I want, therefore I
hope that you'll still help "us" (tinu) with this goal. Bye.
:-) Yes as I stated I'll continue to work on libSPF and have it meet
whatever SPF specification we come up with. I posted all of my comments
in relation to Wayne's ideal draft and have yet to see (or have missed)
any real response to many of the items that I rose. I look forward to
the end of this political stint so that work can commence on ratifying
the final classic draft.
Cheers,
James
--
James Couzens,
Programmer
^ ( ( (
((__)) __\|/__ __|+|__ '. ___ .'
(00) (o o) (0~0) ' (> <) '
---nn-(o__o)-nn---ooO--(_)--Ooo--ooO--(_)--Ooo---ooO--(_)--Ooo---
http://libspf.org -- ANSI C Sender Policy Framework library
http://libsrs.org -- ANSI C Sender Rewriting Scheme library
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7A7C7DCF
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in Atlanta features
SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part