spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Sendmail white paper

2004-11-23 15:54:20
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 05:19:51PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 17:43 +0100, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
The world is changing.  You need to change with it.

Many reasons have been pointed out why the world doesn't _need_ to
change in this particular way. And there's no evidence that the world
_is_ actually deploying SRS on any kind of relevant scale either.

Many times it has been pointed out that forwarding is _your_ problem
not mine so there is no need for me to deploy srs.

Don't start again on the forward_is_not_broken_until_spf subject. We
know you don't agree.

If you forward email to $somewhere, I do not wish to receive bounces
from $somewhere. I may not be able to communicate with $somewhere,
I have to business with $somewhere.  And I am not going to change my
mind just because you forward your mail.

Again I ask what was wrong with the alternatives? Why do you think you
need to make this particular change?

The alternative is to place a guard next to the backdoor and shoot
to kill.  I prefer the locks.  That means I can no longer just enter
my neighbours house, so be it.  It is sad but it is a reality.

Alex


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>