On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 22:31 -0500, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
...
DomainKeys supports localpart customization with the use of
selectors, just as SPF supports localpart customization with
the use of exists:%{l}. So both systems support localparts.
Well this is NOT 100% correct, *please* reread the DomainKeys
Specification and then check out the dk-filter implementation from
sendmail.net
I strongly recommend that folks reread the latest
documentation for DK, IIM, and SES if they wish to comment
on cryptographic solutions.
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/02mar/slides/plenary-3/sld012.htm
Same comment here, you say to read ... please re-read and then implement
the filter before commenting on HOW it works you seem to miss a few KEY
points and subtleties in the use of what you all "localparts"
Just my 2 pesos
Michael Weiner
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in Atlanta features
SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part