Perhaps you gentlemen would consider how much this thread is adding to the
SPF discussion before you inflict any more of it on us?
Thanks for you consideration.
Peter
Alex van den Bogaerdt <alex(_at_)ergens(_dot_)op(_dot_)het(_dot_)net> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 09:04:58AM -0600, Bruce Barnes wrote:
Once again, Alex, you fail to leave out huge chunks of the
conversation that took place between the two of us.
[bruce disagreeing with alex(_at_)slot(_dot_)hollandcasino(_dot_)net]
I still disagree with you. The e-mail address of
alex(_at_)193(_dot_)172(_dot_)40(_dot_)25,
whether written by me in the format or the format of
alex(_at_)[193(_dot_)172(_dot_)40(_dot_)25] validates to the MX server than
handles your
incoming e-mail, as listed in the WHOIS and DNS records for your
domain.
people, I really don't want to create a huge thread here.
I'm quitting this discussion right now but I still would really
appreciate
it if someone can find the time to tell Bruce that he cannot validate
alex(_at_)slot(_dot_)hollandcasino(_dot_)net by probing
alex(_at_)193(_dot_)172(_dot_)40(_dot_)25 (with or
without
brackets doesn't seem to matter according to bruce).
Thanks,
Alex
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in Atlanta
features SPF and Sender ID. To unsubscribe, change your address, or
temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com