RE: Sendmail white paper

On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 06:08, David Woodhouse wrote:
> That's why I'm actually more likely to implement IIM rather than
> DomainKeys, if I do time out and implement one of them before the group
> is done merging the best parts of each. I'm holding off on it so far --
> SES is perfectly sufficient for me for now.
>
> Note that the problem with passage through mailing lists is a technical
> omission which is easily fixable (and indeed seems fixed in IIM
> already). 
So whats a good url for that.... 
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=IIM+email&btnG=Google+Search
Doesn't return anything pertinent.

-- 
http://dmoz.org/profiles/pollei.html
http://sourceforge.net/users/stephen_pollei/
http://www.orkut.com/Profile.aspx?uid=2455954990164098214
http://stephen_pollei.home.comcast.net/
GPG Key fingerprint = EF6F 1486 EC27 B5E7 E6E1  3C01 910F 6BB5 4A7D 9677

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in Atlanta features 
SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part