wayne wrote:
I've done a bunch more work on the draft document for describing the
SPF-classic that I know of and that I will implement in libspf2.
Basically, I am trying to create a better written specification than
spf-draft-200406, but with all the same semantics that I can keep.
This document is *not* intended to be an official statement of what
SPF-classic is, that's up to Meng and MarkL. I am *not* going to
submit this document to the IETF. I *do* think people may find this
document useful, so I'm announcing pre-release versions here.
As I told you on IRC, I am most pleased with your draft. And I believe your
draft is what I think draft-lentczner-spf-00.txt should have been: a de
facto reflection of SPF Classic to-date. For whatever it's worth, you have
my full support for it.
- Mark
System Administrator Asarian-host.org
---
"If you were supposed to understand it,
we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx