spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Campaign: If elected I will...

2004-11-14 08:29:31
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi all,

should I be elected as a council member by the SPF community, I plan, in
good cooperation with Meng, the other council members, and the community
at large, to lead and support the SPF project to...

    "Solve forgery soon, and spam eventually."

    Finish the SPFv1 AKA SPF Classic specification in a sensible, most
    consistent and backwards compatible way, mostly in the spirit of
    Wayne's draft.  Submit the final spec to the IETF.

    Explain to the public that SPF Classic is not Sender-ID/PRA.  Make no
    substantial concessions to Microsoft or other political stakeholders
    against technical reason.  Nevertheless do clever PR.

    Advocate SPF Classic to ESPs and implementors as a solution to the
    envelope sender forgery problem.  Develop and advocate SES, SRS, et al
    as equivalent alternative solutions to the forwarding problem (let the
    market decide).

    Make plans on what to do next.  SPFv1.5?  SPFv2?  End-to-end crypto
    such as S/MIME?  Domain-based reputation systems (cf. SpamCop?)?

    If, after 9 months, the project appears to be continuing beyond the
    first year so that a new council will have to be elected, draft a new
    charter and establish proper election procedures.

That is my agenda.  I hope that this meets your goals and that you will
support me, the new council, and, above all, the SPF project in achieving
them.

As for my SPF-related résumé, if you're interested:

    In late 2003 and early 2004 I took part in discussing and reviewing
    some of SPF Classic's and SRS's fundamental (and not so fundamental)
    design issues.

    In 2004 I have spent time on enthusiastically advocating SPF to the
    author of the Courier MTA (who was highly sceptical at first but has
    now implemented SPF support), to some small and medium sized ISPs, to
    a lot of site admins, and to the public in general.

    On the other hand, I have lobbied all-out against using XML in SPF
    records, against using the RFC 2822 message header as the primary
    scope for SPF, and against Meng's decision to merge SPF with Caller-ID
    into Sender-ID in order to get the 400lbs gorilla AKA Microsoft
    "aboard" (although I do recognize what this decision has probably
    gained us).

    Finally, I have worked on implementing a basic SPF filter for the
    Courier MTA (which is what I use on my servers as you might have
    guessed) before its author himself decided to follow the trend. ;-)

Julian Mehnle.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Get my PGP public key at <http://www.mehnle.net/about>.

iQA/AwUBQZdry8C+zypQWVo7EQKbtgCgxdCAHAMAqsRucTWqH0xtNo47CUcAoP5I
fV+3XyQG1bRXvHhH7CRV3qXk
=jwXT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>