-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, william(at)elan.net spewed into the bitstream:
w>
w>I'm going to conduct new poll on organizing itself because I do not think
w>current effort is going to go well and it is not representative of what
w>SPF community is expecting (but I may well be wrong). If it turns out I'm
w>wrong and people really want to have the council immediately that will decide
w>what to do for next year (with no rules governing it or organization) then
w>I'll be able to properly decide on the "conditional" part of my acceptance
w>to be there and if I want to work on such council or not.
w>
w>As always please answer by replying to the list and stick to the question
w>itself (which except for question 5 has multiple choice or yes/no answers).
w>This poll will last 5 days until Wednesday.
w>
w>Questions:
w>
w>1. Do you believe that SPF Organization (and SPF council) need to have
w> defined rules of order to function properly and be able to represent
w> SPF Community?
w> Answers: YES/NO
YES
w> If answered YES, how do you think the rules should be approved:
w> a. Separate full work on the SPF-discuss mail list
w> b. Vote only by SPF elected council
b
w>2. Do you want to see elections immediately for SPF council (answer
w> no matter how you answered 1)?
w> Answers: YES/NO
YES
w> If answered YES, what do you believe this new council should do
w> (answer each question separately):
w> 2a. Work on SPF charter and rules of conduct. YES/NO
w> 2b. Supervise SPF community activities as seen in part 3 of my
w> original SPF Organization Questionnaire? YES/NO
2a. YES
2b. YES
w>3. If elections for the council are carried out without any formally
w> approved rules, how long should the council function?
w> Answers:
w> a. Until the new SPF charter and rules are approved by the community
w> b. For 6 months no matter what
w> c. For 1 year no matter what
w> d. For 2 years no matter what
w> e. The elections should not be carried out at all if there
w> are no approved rules on how long SPF council will serve.
Until a formal body is organized. Sorry but your answers did not fit the
response I needed to give!
w>4. What should be the rules for initial election for the council?
w> Answers:
w> a. Anybody at all (no restrictions for those on spf-discuss
w> no matter if they posted before or not).
w> b. Anybody who have participated in SPF Community (based
w> on at least one post on spf-discuss mail list)
w> c. Only those who have participated in SPF Community recently
w> based on last 1 month of posts
w> d. Only those who have participated in SPF Community recently
w> based on last 2 month of posts
w> e. Those who have participated more actively in SPF (at least
w> 2 posts every month for 3 of last 6 months)
e.
w>5. Who would you like to see conducting elections for SPF Community?
w> (Give the name of one of the active SPF participants who you like
w> to see do it. The person with more votes then others will be asked
w> to do it. If he/she declines, then next person on the list, etc)
John Glube.
- --
csm(_at_)moongroup(_dot_)com, head geek
http://moongroup.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBlk0bv6Gjsf2pQ0oRAmeYAKCAofQO6xzpdT4lB8nurcauTTfviQCdFO5u
FWUL0ha3sDt2cjpFFUDsfOk=
=/gHX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----