-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com] On Behalf Of
Richard Bang
Sent: vrijdag 26 november 2004 13:45
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: [spf-discuss] portent.listbox.com
Hi,
Is there something wrong with my SPF implementation or should the
list manager get his software fixed :)
Received-SPF: none (portent.listbox.com does not support
permitted sender hosts)
client-ip=208.58.1.195;
envelope-from:<listbox+trampoline+735+1604167+aad2a8c1(_at_)v2(_dot_)list
box.com>;
If that was the envelope-from, then that Received-SPF header did NOT come
from you! (unless your SPF implementation is broken beyond recognition).
Yours will be one that says:
Received-SPF: pass (mx0.ftgate.com: domain of
listbox+trampoline+735+1604167+aad2a8c1(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
designates
207.8.214.5 as permitted sender)
Received-SPF: none (portent.listbox.com does ...
N.B. Should not the relay-name ($j) be the first thing after "("? The
format of this header seems to vary; but, for obvious reasons, I'd say, it
is useful to know who added it. :)
- Mark
System Administrator Asarian-host.org
---
"If you were supposed to understand it,
we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx