spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail.

2004-11-04 09:26:20
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:45:13 +0000, Peter Bowyer <peter(_at_)bowyer(_dot_)org> 
wrote:
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 16:33:31 +0100, Stefan Engelbert 
<stefan(_at_)gfi(_dot_)com> wrote:
Since they had allready quite a lot of time to fix it (and I am sure
some are reading here....) I know which of your rules to choose :-(

They won't 'fix' it because it's deliberate - they've decided how best
to handle the situation in the context of their business and in the
knowledge that it breaks an RFC. They're not the first or last
orgainsation to do that. A listing on rfci is hardly an idp.

Peter


BTW, guys, I just found that they finaaly published the other SPF records:

spf-a.hotmail.com.      54m9s IN TXT    "v=spf1 ip4:209.240.192.0/19
ip4:65.52.0.0/14 ip4:131.107.0.0/16 ip4:157.54.0.0/15
ip4:157.56.0.0/14 ip4:157.60.0.0/16 ip4:167.220.0.0/16
ip4:204.79.135.0/24 ip4:204.79.188.0/24 ip4:204.79.252.0/24
ip4:207.46.0.0/16 ip4:199.2.137.0/24 ~all"

spf-b.hotmail.com.      53m32s IN TXT   "v=spf1 ip4:199.103.90.0/23
ip4:204.182.144.0/24 ip4:204.255.244.0/23 ip4:206.138.168.0/21
ip4:64.4.0.0/18 ip4:65.54.128.0/17 ip4:207.68.128.0/18
ip4:207.68.192.0/20 ip4:207.82.250.0/23 ip4:207.82.252.0/23
ip4:209.1.112.0/23 ~all"

Maybe they were calculating all these time. :)

P.S.: just wondering, isn't /16, /14, /17, /18 too big  to include in
the authorized list of "sending host". Or, am I missing something
here?

Regards,

Zia