On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 08:52 -0800, Rand Wacker wrote:
There is currently very little deployment of IIM or SES, and little
indication that will grow soon. There are already a number of large
sites signing/checking DK, so there is real sender benefit to implement.
I still have hopes that IIM and DK will centralize on a standard spec,
so I didn't want to confuse the issue with two (comparably expensive)
crypto approaches yet without major benefits to doing so.
Oh I see, so this is a POPULARITY CONTEST. Well, glad to see it will be
the MOST POPULAR cryptography scheme that gets all the attention (yes
just as stupid as saying "yeah it was in the last place I looked").
Glad to see you are right on top of everything over there at Sendmail
Rand.
Cheers,
James
--
James Couzens,
Programmer
( ( (
((__)) __\|/__ __|-|__ '. ___ .'
(00) (o o) (0~0) ' (> <) '
---nn-(o__o)-nn---ooO--(_)--Ooo--ooO--(_)--Ooo---ooO--(_)--Ooo---
http://libspf.org -- ANSI C Sender Policy Framework library
http://libsrs.org -- ANSI C Sender Rewriting Scheme library
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7A7C7DCF
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in Atlanta features
SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part